ArticleScientific reports2024
Analyzing the adverse events of NK-1 receptor antagonists: a pharmacovigilance study from the FAERS database.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNK-1 receptor antagonists (NK-1RAs) are proven to be successful in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). The safety profile of NK-1RAs has not been systematically analyzed in the real world. This pharmacovigilance study investigated the differences in adverse events (AEs) between NK-1RAs.
methodsAdverse events (AEs) associated with NK-1RAs were gathered and standardized using data from the FAERS database spanning from the first quarter of 2009 to the fourth quarter of 2023. Various disproportionality techniques were employed for data analysis, such as the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS).
resultsA total of 5434AE reports listing NK-1RAs as the primary suspected drugs were identified. The System Organ Classes (SOC) appeared as significant safety signals were found. Among NK-1RAs, the most frequently reported AEs were related to general disorders and administration site conditions. In terms of PT level, the strong signals were mainly injection site reactions associated with aprepitant and fosaprepitant. Moreover, toxic encephalopathy and encephalopathy of the aprepitant were all positive with four algorithms. A significant finding was the recognition of adverse events linked to endocrine disorders, which were not previously mentioned in the medication instructions.
conclusionThe safety profile of NK-1RAs has been reported to be variable.If intravenous formulations were used in the clinic, injection site reactions should be a concern. In addition, more attention should be paid to the management of encephalopathy toxicity in patients treated with aprepitant in combination with ifosfamide. Besides known AEs, we have identified several new high-risk AEs, such as inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, adrenal insufficiency and hyponatraemia. Overall, clinicians should closely monitor the occurrence of NK-1RA-related AEs in clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.