Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39732882›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Potential backfiring effects of Marine Protected Areas on kelp herbivory.

B Reis, F Arenas, Á Sánchez-Gallego, A F S Marques, I Sousa-Pinto, J N Franco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

B ReisCIIMAR/CIMAR-LA ‑Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Avenida General Norton de Matos, S/N, 4450‑208, Matosinhos, Portugal. rbiancareis@ciimar.up.pt.
F ArenasCIIMAR/CIMAR-LA ‑Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Avenida General Norton de Matos, S/N, 4450‑208, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Á Sánchez-GallegoMARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre & ARNET-Aquatic Research Network Associated Laboratory - CETEMARES, Av. do Porto de Pesca 30, Peniche, 2520-620, Portugal.
A F S MarquesCIIMAR/CIMAR-LA ‑Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Avenida General Norton de Matos, S/N, 4450‑208, Matosinhos, Portugal.
I Sousa-PintoCIIMAR/CIMAR-LA ‑Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Avenida General Norton de Matos, S/N, 4450‑208, Matosinhos, Portugal.
J N FrancoMARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre & ARNET-Aquatic Research Network Associated Laboratory - CETEMARES, Av. do Porto de Pesca 30, Peniche, 2520-620, Portugal.

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 2020.08068.BD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management and creation of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) is currently under great focus, with international organisations aiming to protect 30% of our oceans by 2030. The success of MPAs depends on a nuanced understanding of local ecological dynamics and threats, which can significantly influence ecosystem balance. Herbivory can be a stressor for foundation species, namely kelp forests, contributing to their decline in several regions of the globe. However, the dynamics inherent to herbivory and MPA's implementation are still poorly understood. Here, the impact of protection status, depth, kelp species, and grazer type on herbivory (occurrence, rate, and grazer frequency) was assessed through a comprehensive experimental approach involving tethering experiments and faunal characterisation of macro-herbivores. The research was conducted in habitats off the central coast of Portugal: Peniche (PEN) and the MPA Berlengas Archipelago (MPA-BER). Our findings revealed that herbivory occurrence and rate are higher within the MPA, especially at greater depths. Instead of urchins, fish are the significant contributors to kelp consumption, showing a preference for the kelp S. polyschides. Results provide the first experimental evidence in the Atlantic region identifying fish as the dominant herbivores driving increased kelp biomass loss, a relationship potentially magnified by MPA implementation. Hence, protection status may not benefit all ecosystem components, enhancing the need for robust MPA management to balance trophic interactions and support biodiversity and ecosystem resilience.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemHerbivoryKelpAnimalsBiomassFishesFood ChainPortugalHerbivorous fishHerbivoryKelpMPAsTrophic interactions

Identifiers

PMID39732882
PMCPMC11682423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.