ArticleScientific reports2024
A calibration framework toward model generalization for bacteria concentration estimation in water resource recovery facilities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wastewater-based surveillance of microbial pathogens in GCC countries (2015-2025): a scoping review and questionnaire survey with stakeholders.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Zero-shot generalization for predicting viral concentrations and evaluating removal efficiencies across wastewater matrices.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reduced bacteria concentrations in wastewater is a key indicator of the efficacy of water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs). However, monitoring the presence of bacterial concentrations in real time at each stage of the WRRF is challenging as it requires taking and processing water samples offline. Although few studies have been proposed to predict bacterial concentrations using data-driven models, generalizing these models to unseen data from different WRRFs remains challenging. This paper proposes a calibration approach based on neural networks to adapt the optimal models across various WRRFs in Saudi Arabia for bacterial estimation at the influent and effluent stages. The calibration relies on the out-of-distribution (OOD) framework of the physiochemical water parameters (e.g., pH, COD, TDS, turbidity, conductivity) with a design threshold chosen based on the data distribution of the received unseen samples. We propose a calibration framework that continues updating the trained neural network model for accurate bacterial concentration estimation upon receiving new samples. We tested the effectiveness of the proposed calibration scheme on four WRRF datasets in Saudi Arabia, comparing the results with before and after calibration without the OOD. Before calibration model was based on a traditional and optimal neural network approach, typically considered the conventional method for building neural networks. After calibration without OOD, the model continued retraining without explicitly checking for OOD condition. The results showed that the proposed calibration framework of the selected baseline WRRF with the OOD scheme improved [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] of the worst-case influent bacteria concentration before calibration and after calibration without OOD, respectively. Similarly, the worst-case effluent bacteria concentration estimation was enhanced by [Formula: see text] before calibration and [Formula: see text] after calibration without the OOD. Our findings highlight the importance of integrating the calibration framework with neural network approaches to achieve model generalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.