ArticleScientific reports2024
A comparative study of several enhanced energy operators for vibration exciter bearing fault diagnosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rolling bearings of the vibration exciter are prone to failure due to long-term high amplitude alternating impact loads, causing economic losses and threatening production safety. The heavy environmental noise during the operation of the vibration exciter and the high vibration level generated by the eccentric block make the weak bearing fault features submerged and difficult to extract. Teager-Kaiser energy operator is a popular method for extracting bearing fault features. However, it has poor noise-robustness and low accuracy of frequency estimation of the exciter with heavy noise and multiple disturbances. Therefore, three enhanced energy operators-symmetric higher-order analytical energy operator (SHAEO), multi-resolution symmetric difference energy operator (MSDAEO), and symmetric higher-order frequency weighted energy operator (SHFWEO) have been introduced. This paper compares and studies the three energy operators through theoretical analysis and vibration exciter bearing fault diagnosis experiments. The results show that MSDAEO has the most outstanding noise robustness, but has the minimum effect on improving the signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) of the signal among the three energy operators. SHFWEO has the most prominent performance on improving SIR but is sensitive to the signal energy. SHAEO can increase the amplitude of the signal, and its ability to improve signal SIR is higher than MSDAEO but lower than SHFWEO. Its ability to improve signal SNR is the weakest among the three. Finally, the characteristics of preprocessing methods that can be jointly used by the three energy operators in different application scenarios are presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.