Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39732851›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Top-down instructions influence the attentional weight on color and shape dimensions during bidimensional search.

Zoe Jing Xu, Alejandro Lleras, Zixu Gavin Gong, Simona Buetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zoe Jing XuPsychology Department, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Champaign, United States. jingxu9@illinois.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2649-418X
Alejandro LlerasPsychology Department, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Champaign, United States.
Zixu Gavin GongPsychology Department, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Champaign, United States.
Simona BuettiPsychology Department, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Champaign, United States.

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) BCS 1921735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient searches are guided by target-distractor distinctiveness: the greater the distinctiveness, the faster the search. Previous research showed that when the target and distractors differ along both color and shape dimensions (i.e., bidimensional search), distinctiveness along individual dimensions combine collinearly to guide the search, following a city-block metric. This result was found when participants expected the target and distractors to differ along both dimensions. In the present study, we used an instruction manipulation to investigate how bidimensional search varies in response to different top-down instructions. Using unidimensional search performance observed in Experiment 1, we predicted bidimensional search performance under three conditions: when participants were instructed to attend to color (Experiment 2), shape (Experiment 3), or both (Experiment 4). Results showed that instructions influenced how distinctiveness along color and shape combine to guide attention: when instructed to search for a target color, participants allocated more attentional weight to the color dimension (and less weight to the shape dimension) compared to when instructed to search for a target shape. Our study presents a novel technique to quantify how top-down instructions change attentional weighting to different features during bidimensional visual searches.

Indexed as

AttentionColor PerceptionAdultColorFemaleForm PerceptionHumansMalePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationReaction TimeYoung AdultAttentional weightingBidimensional searchVisual search

Identifiers

PMID39732851
PMCPMC11682205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.