ArticleScientific reports2024
High density laminar recordings reveal cell type and layer specific responses to infrared neural stimulation in the rat neocortex.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large-scale electrophysiology at single-spike resolution.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026Review
- Local infrared stimulation modulates spontaneous cortical slow wave dynamics in anesthetized rats.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The potential of laminar functional MRI in refining the understanding of epilepsy in humans.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Focal thalamic infrared neural stimulation propagates dynamical transformations in auditory cortex.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infrared neural stimulation has consistently shown that temperature is a critical neuronal state variable. However, a comprehensive understanding of the biophysical background is essential. In this study, using high-density laminar electrode recordings, we investigated the impact of pulsed and continuous-wave infrared illumination on cortical neurons in anesthetized rats ([Formula: see text]). By analyzing the infrared (IR) stimulation-related responses of more than 7500 single units, we found that elevating tissue temperature with IR stimulation resulted in a significant increase in the number of cells affected, including a substantial rise in the number of inhibited cells. Pulsed stimulation affected an average of [Formula: see text] of units, resulting primarily in increased activity. In contrast, continuous stimulation significantly increased the percentage of affected cells to [Formula: see text], with single units tending to be suppressed. Furthermore, when analyzing cell types, a higher percentage of principal cells displayed increased firing rates ([Formula: see text]) compared to suppressed activity ([Formula: see text]). Meanwhile, more interneurons were suppressed ([Formula: see text]) than showed increased activity ([Formula: see text]). On average, the firing rate of neurons reached 90% of the maximal activation within approximately 36 seconds after the onset of infrared stimulation. The proportion of neurons with suppressed activity decreased with cortical depth, while the proportion of neurons with elevated activity increased in deeper layers. These results provide valuable data to understand the mechanism of infrared neural stimulation in the living brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.