ArticleScientific reports2024
Efficacy of glutathione inhibitor eprenetapopt against the vulnerability of glutathione metabolism in SMARCA4-, SMARCB1- and PBRM1-deficient cancer cells.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mutation of genes related to the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex is detected in 20% of all cancers. The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex comprises about 15 subunits and is classified into three subcomplexes: cBAF, PBAF, and ncBAF. Previously, we showed that ovarian clear cell carcinoma cells deficient in ARID1A, a subunit of the cBAF complex, are synthetic lethal with several genes required for glutathione (GSH) synthesis and are therefore sensitive to the GSH inhibitor eprenetapopt (APR-246). However, we do not know whether cancer cells deficient in SWI/SNF components other than ARID1A are selectively sensitive to treatment with eprenetapopt. Here, we show that SMARCA4-, SMARCB1-, and PBRM1-deficient cells are more sensitive to eprenetapopt than SWI/SNF-proficient cells. We found that deficiency of SMARCA4, SMARCB1, or PBRM1 attenuates transcription of the SLC7A11 gene (which supplies cysteine as a raw metabolic material for GSH synthesis) by the failure of recruitment of cBAF and PBAF to the promotor and enhancer regions of the SLC7A11 locus, thereby reducing basal levels of GSH. In addition, eprenetapopt decreased the amount of intracellular GSH and increased the intracellular amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS), followed by induction of apoptosis. Taken together, eprenetapopt could be a promising selective agent for SWI/SNF-deficient cancer cells derived from SMARCA4-deficient lung cancers, SMARCB1-deficient rhabdoid tumors, and PBRM1-deficient kidney cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.