Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39732824›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Concordance and test-retest consistency of sleep biomarker-based neurodegenerative disorder profiling.

Daniel J Levendowski, Debby Tsuang, Lana M Chahine, Christine M Walsh, Chris Berka, Joyce K Lee-Iannotti, David Salat, Corrine Fischer, Gandis Mazeika, Bradley F Boeve and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Personal and Family Perspectives Regarding Neurodegenerative Disorder Risk.Journal of community medicine & public health · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Daniel J LevendowskiAdvanced Brain Monitoring, 2237 Faraday Avenue, Suite 100, Carlsbad, CA, 92008, USA. Dan@b-alert.com.
Debby TsuangVA Puget Sound, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lana M ChahineUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Christine M WalshUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Chris BerkaAdvanced Brain Monitoring, 2237 Faraday Avenue, Suite 100, Carlsbad, CA, 92008, USA.
Joyce K Lee-IannottiBanner University Medical Center Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
David SalatMassachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Corrine FischerSt. Michael's General Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Gandis MazeikaAdvanced Brain Monitoring, 2237 Faraday Avenue, Suite 100, Carlsbad, CA, 92008, USA.
Bradley F BoeveMayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA.
Luigi Ferini StrambiUniversitá Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.
Simon J G LewisMacquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Thomas C NeylanUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Erik K St LouisMayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

MAYO CLINIC CENTER FOR TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE ACTIVITIESUL1RR024150 · NCRR · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RIZZA, ROBERT A. · 2006 to 2011
$66.4M
Project: Predicting PhenoconversionU19AG071754 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Aleksandar Videnovic · 2021 to 2026
$41.2M
Clinical Features and Neuropathological Basis of Sleep Wake Behavior in Alzheimer's and PSPR01AG060477 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Lea Tenenholz Grinberg, Thomas C Neylan · 2019 to 2026
$8.2M
Multi-site longitudinal Integrated Neurocognitive and Sleep-Behavior Profiler for the Endophenotypic Classification of Dementia Subtypes (INSPECDS)R44AG050326 · NIA · ADVANCED BRAIN MONITORING, INC. · PI BERKA, CHRIS · 2016 to 2024
$4.4M
Use of wearable sensors to improve the early diagnosis of DLBR33AG064271 · NIA · SEATTLE INST FOR BIOMEDICAL/CLINICAL RES · PI TSUANG, DEBBY WEN · 2022 to 2024
$2.1M
Use of wearable sensors to improve the early diagnosis of DLBR21AG064271 · NIA · SEATTLE INST FOR BIOMEDICAL/CLINICAL RES · PI TSUANG, DEBBY WEN · 2019 to 2020
$415k
National Health and Medical Research Council 1195830NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024150NIA NIH HHS R01 AG060477NIA NIH HHS R21 AG064271NIA NIH HHS R33 AG064271NIA NIH HHS R44 AG050326NIA NIH HHS U19 AG071754NIH HHS R33AG064271NIH HHS R44AG050326NIH HHS RO1AG060477NIH HHS RR024150-01NIH HHS U19 AG071754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers that aid in early detection of neurodegeneration are needed to enable early symptomatic treatment and enable identification of people who may benefit from neuroprotective interventions. Increasing evidence suggests that sleep biomarkers may be useful, given the bi-directional relationship between sleep and neurodegeneration and the prominence of sleep disturbances and altered sleep architectural characteristics in several neurodegenerative disorders. This study aimed to demonstrate that sleep can accurately characterize specific neurodegenerative disorders (NDD). A four-class machine-learning algorithm was trained using age and nine sleep biomarkers from patients with clinically-diagnosed manifest and prodromal NDDs, including Alzheimer's disease dementia (AD = 27), Lewy body dementia (LBD = 18), and isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD = 15), as well as a control group (CG = 58). The algorithm was validated in a total of 381 recordings, which included the training data set plus an additional AD = 10, iRBD = 18, Parkinson disease without dementia (PD = 29), mild cognitive impairment (MCI = 78) and CG = 128. Test-retest consistency was then assessed in LBD = 10, AD = 9, and CG = 46. The agreement between the NDD profiles and their respective clinical diagnoses exceeded 75% for the AD, LBD, and CG, and improved when NDD participants classified Likely Normal with NDD indications consistent with their clinical diagnosis were considered. Profiles for iRBD, PD and MCI participants were consistent with the heterogeneity of disease severities, with the majority of overt disagreements explained by normal sleep characterization in 27% of iRBD, 21% of PD, and 26% of MCI participants. For test-retest assignments, the same or similar NDD profiles were obtained for 88% of LBD, 86% in AD, and 98% of CG participants. The potential utility for NDD subtyping based on sleep biomarkers demonstrates promise and requires further prospective development and validation in larger NDD cohorts.

Indexed as

BiomarkersLewy Body DiseaseNeurodegenerative DiseasesAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAlzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedParkinson DiseaseREM Sleep Behavior DisorderSleepBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseaseNeurodegenerative diseaseNon-REM hypertoniaParkinsonian spectrum disordersREM sleep behavior disorderSleep biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID39732824
PMCPMC11682374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.