ArticleScientific reports2024
Revisiting the Rytov approximation in diffuse optics and its applications for the inverse and forward problems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We propose an overview of the Rytov approximation in diffuse optics of biological tissues, for the inverse and forward problems. First, we show a physical interpretation of the Rytov approximation as a type of partial pathlength (named fluence rate partial pathlength) which is distinct from the usual partial pathlength for reflectance measurements. Second, we study the accuracy of the Rytov approximation for the calculation of Jacobians considering absorption perturbations and reflectance measurements. For higher absorption and lower reduced scattering values the discrepancy between the true Jacobian (i.e., the reflectance partial pathlength) and that obtained with the Rytov approximation (i.e., the fluence rate partial pathlength) can be up to about 70% for diffusion theory calculations and up to about 25% for Monte Carlo simulations. For higher reduced scattering values, the discrepancies become less than 10%. Third, we propose a calibration method that can circumvent numerical inaccuracies when the calculation of Jacobians is carried out in presence of highly absorbing layers. Finally, fourth, we also propose an original formula derived from the Rytov approximation for reflectance measurements, and we show how it performs for the forward problem, when we consider defects with large absorption contrast with respect to the background.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.