ArticleScientific reports2024
Decoding of pain during heel lancing in human neonates with EEG signal and machine learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electroencephalography during acute painful procedures in neonates: a scoping review.Pain reports · 2026Review
- PANDIA: Personalized neuro-symbolic multimodal fusion for interpretable neonatal pain assessment.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, pain assessment using electroencephalogram signals and machine learning methods in clinical studies is of great importance, especially for those who cannot express their pain. Since newborns are among the high-risk group and always experience pain at the beginning of birth, in this research, the severity of newborns has been investigated and evaluated. Other studies related to the annoyance of newborns have used the EEG signal of newborns alone; therefore, in this study, the intensity of newborn pain was measured using the electroencephalogram signal of 107 infants who were stimulated by the heel lance in three levels: no pain, low pain and moderate pain were recorded as a single trial and evaluated. The support vector machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Ensemble bagging classifiers were trained using the K-fold cross-validation method and features of the brain's time-frequency domain. The results were obtained with accuracies of 72.8 ± 2, 84.4 ± 1.3 and 82.9 ± 1.6%, respectively. Also, in examining the problem of distinguishing pain and no pain, the electroencephalogram signal of 74 infants was evaluated, and similar to the three-class mode, with the 10-fold validation method, we reached the highest accuracy of 100% in Bagging classifier and 98.6 ± 0.1 accuracy in KNN and SVM classifiers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.