ArticleScientific reports2024
Gene expression modulation in human aortic smooth muscle cells under induced physiological mechanical stretch.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deciphering single-cell landscape unravels cell-type-specific functional roles of RNA mTheranostics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we investigated gene expression in vitro of human primary Aortic smooth muscle cells (AoSMCs) in response to 9% physiological dynamic stretch over a 4 to 72-h timeframe using RT-qPCR. AoSMC were derived from primary culture and were exposed to continuous cycles of stretch and relaxation at 1 Hz by a computer-controlled Flex Jr.™ Tension System. Unstretched control AoSMCs were simultaneously cultured in the same dishes. Our results revealed a rapid and significant upregulation of specific genes (COL1A1, FBN1, LAMA5, TGFBR1 and TGFBR2) within the initial 4 h for AoSMCs subjected to dynamic stretching, whilst control cells did not respond within the same 4 h. The upregulated genes were the ones associated with extracellular matrix (ECM) fibrillogenesis and regulation of traction forces. Interestingly, stretched cells maintained stable gene expression between 4 and 72 h, whilst control cells exhibited variations over time in the absence of mechanical cues. These findings shed light on the essential role played by pulsatile stretches in the regulation of gene expressions by AoSMCs and the intricate processes governing their mechanobiological function, paving the way for further investigations in cardiovascular health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.