ArticleScientific reports2024
The performance of a novel diagnostic criteria for neurosyphilis in HIV-negative patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical presentation of neurosyphilis - a single-center retrospective data analysis.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the service quality and diagnostic performance of syphilis self-test kits purchased from E-commerce platforms in China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Rapid Plasma Reagin Tests of Serum, Cerebrospinal Fluid, and Aqueous Humor of Patients With Ocular Syphilis and AIDS.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- From seropositivity to neurosyphilis: clinical spectrum and diagnostic classification in hospitalized neurology patients: a 16-year retrospective study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diagnosing neurosyphilis in clinical settings poses significant challenges due to the absence of highly efficient diagnostic criteria. Our objective was to enhance the existing diagnostic criteria and assess their sensitivity and specificity for identifying neurosyphilis in HIV-negative patients. We conducted a retrospective review of patient records from a cross-sectional study carried out between December 2019 and May 2023. This study was designed to explore clinical practices in the diagnosis and treatment of neurosyphilis. We proposed and validated a new set of diagnostic criteria across 782 cases, comparing three different NS criteria for diagnostic efficiency. Among the 782 patients analyzed, 410 were diagnosed with neurosyphilis, while 372 were not. The newly developed NS criteria demonstrated a sensitivity of 99.5% and a specificity of 94.6%, with the added benefit of being user-friendly. In subgroups categorized by neurological symptoms and syphilis stages, the new NS criteria also exhibited high sensitivity and specificity. Statistical analyses confirmed that the novel NS criteria performed comparably well to the expanded NS criteria. The novel NS criteria for HIV-negative patients exhibited high sensitivity and specificity, proving to be both effective and convenient for physicians to implement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.