Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39732769›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Impaired visual attention and numerical processing in children with anisometropic amblyopia and after visual acuity recovery.

Yachen Wang, Shuzhen Li, Di Chang, Zhihan Liu, Luyao Cheng, Tao Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yachen Wang *Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.
Shuzhen Li *Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.
Di ChangBeijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.
Zhihan LiuBeijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.
Luyao ChengBeijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China.
Tao FuBeijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China. angelbjtr@126.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82071001Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality 7222030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amblyopia affects more than visual acuity. To compare the performances of visual selective attention and numerical processing in children with anisometropic amblyopia and children with normal vision, and investigate whether performance would be improved after visual acuity recovery, we performed 3 visual attention tasks (identifying number location task, numerical comparison task, and specific number comparison task) in children with anisometropic amblyopia, children who had recovered from anisometropic amblyopia, and children with normal vision in 6-8 and 9-11 years groups. The numerical processing ability, visual selective attention, and numerical distance effect were assessed by their reaction time of different tasks. The amblyopia group showed significantly worse visual selective attention than control group. However, the recovered amblyopic group showed worse visual selective attention compared to control group only in 9-11 years group. Children aged 6-8 had a greater numerical distance effect than 9-11 in control group, while there were no significant differences between different age groups in amblyopia and recovered amblyopic children. These findings suggest children with anisometropic amblyopia have not only defective visual selective attention but also different age-related patterns of numerical distance effect. Moreover, the improvement of visual selective attention after early stage of visual acuity recovery is better at younger age.

Indexed as

AmblyopiaAttentionVisual AcuityCase-Control StudiesChildFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeVisual PerceptionAmblyopia recoveryAnisometropic amblyopiaNumerical distance effectNumerical processingVisual selective attention

Identifiers

PMID39732769
PMCPMC11682120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.