ArticleScientific reports2024
Obturation quality of bioceramic sealers with different obturation techniques: a micro-CT evaluation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endodontic treatment outcomes in apical periodontitis cases by the lateral condensation versus warm vertical compaction techniques: a one-year follow-up study.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Comment on 'Influence of Engine-Driven NiTi Files on the Effectiveness and Technical Quality of Endodontic Treatment Performed by Undergraduate Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'.International endodontic journal · 2026Article
- Colour change and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth after staining and walking bleach: role of filling strategy.Odontology · 2026Article
- Dens invaginatus: a clinical update and a proposed new three-dimensional classification.British dental journal · 2026Review
- Endodontic treatment of a molar-incisor malformation of the maxillary first molar: a case report.Restorative dentistry & endodontics · 2026Article
- A Novel Ultrasonic Welding-Assisted Thermoplastic Root Canal Obturation Technique: An Ex Vivo Proof-of-Concept Study.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Article
- Single-Cone vs. Carrier-Based Root Canal Obturation with a Calcium-Silicate-Based Sealer: An In Vitro µ-CT Analysis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Functional and Bioactive Performance of Premixed Bioceramic Sealers with Warm Obturation: A Scoping Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Root Canal Obturation with Hydraulic Condensation and Tricalcium Silicate Bioceramic Sealer: A 12-Month Observational Study on Periapical Healing.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Comparative analysis between resin-based root canal sealer and recent bioceramic-based root canal sealers using MicroCT, film thickness, and solubility.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
- Clinical and radiographic success of single-cone bioceramic obturation versus traditional techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis in vitro study was designed to compare void volume in root canal fillings performed using the single-cone (SC) technique and the continuous wave condensation (CWC) technique with bioceramic (BC) sealer. Forty human-extracted, single-rooted mandibular premolars were cleaned, shaped, and divided into two groups (n = 20) based on the obturation technique. In the first group, obturation was performed using the CWC technique with TotalFill HiFlow BC sealer. In the second group, obturation was performed using the SC technique with the conventional TotalFill BC sealer. All roots were scanned with micro-CT, and ©CTAn software version 1.20.8.0 was used to measure the void volume of each root third in all samples. Despite the different obturation techniques, both groups exhibited voids in filled root canals. The overall mean void volume in the SC group (0.253 ± 0.186) was significantly higher (p = 0.000) than that in the CWC group (0.035 ± 0.043). The difference was significant in the coronal (p = 0.000) and middle (p = 0.017) thirds. The CWC technique with TotalFill HiFlow BC sealer achieved superior obturation quality compared to the SC technique with conventional BC sealer in oval-shaped premolars.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.