ArticleScientific reports2024
Research on mechanisms for optimizing the risk resistance capability of hypernetworks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization Method for Robustness of Hypernetwork Communication with Integrated Structural Features.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Emotionally consistent music melody generation algorithm integrating prompt perception and hyper-network optimization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The research on hypernetworks robustness focuses on improving their ability to resist various risks such as attacks and disasters. In the face of deliberate attacks, there is a huge risk of failure in Barabási-Albert (BA) hypernetworks. However, the methods to improve the risk resistant capacity of BA hypernetwork are lack. In this paper, two optimization mechanisms are proposed based on structural characteristics and connectivity. They are the self-optimization mechanism of random recombination for hyperedges(RRH) and the self-optimization mechanism of low degree preference recombination for hyperedges(LDPRH). The best improvement performance (BIP) is used as the evaluation metric, and a comparative analysis is conducted to assess the effectiveness of these mechanisms in enhancing the robustness of BA hypernetworks through simulation experiments. The research results indicate that both mechanisms effectively improve the hypernetwork's risk resistance, but the optimization effects differ. When the number of recombined hyperedges is 0.2*M (where M is the total number of hyperedges in the hypernetwork), the BIP of the random recombination mechanism stabilize at 25%, while the BIP of the low preference recombination mechanism ultimately reaches about 65%. To further validate the effectiveness of these optimization mechanisms, they were applied to Newman-Watts (NW) hypernetworks and Barabási-Albert (BA) ordinary networks, the latter based on binary relationships. The results showed that these optimization mechanisms also improved the risk resistance of NW hypernetworks and BA ordinary networks, especially in the BA ordinary network, where the BIP could reach up to 73%. Additionally, a significant correlation is observed between BIP, the number of hyperedge reshuffling operations, and the uniformity of the hypernetwork. Moreover, these optimization mechanisms are further validated in the context of China's high-speed railway hypernetwork, highlighting their practical application potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.