ArticleBMC health services research2024
A cross-sectional study assessing customers' perception, satisfaction, and attitude toward e-pharmacy services in Saudi Arabia.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElectronic pharmacy (e-pharmacy) services are growing rapidly, offering increased accessibility, privacy, and value. Understanding e-pharmacy customer satisfaction, attitudes, and perceptions in Saudi Arabia is crucial for improving the services and enhancing health outcomes. This study aims to examine customers' perceptions, preferences, satisfaction, and experiences with electronic pharmacy services, including community pharmacy e-commerce.
methodsA quantitative cross-sectional design was utilized and conducted in Saudi Arabia. A self-administered online questionnaire was distributed via social media, and convenience sampling was used to collect data from December 2022 to January 2023. The questionnaire was adapted from validated academic questionnaires and consisted of five sections. The online form data was retrieved and analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics program.
resultsThe sample comprised 351 respondents, most of whom were Saudi citizens (90.3%), aged 41-60 years (36.5%), and non-healthcare professionals (35%). Of the participants, 256 (72.93%) were aware of e-pharmacies. Younger participants and those with higher education levels were more aware of e-pharmacies (p < 0.05), with no significant effect of gender or nationality on awareness. Positive perceptions of e-pharmacies exist, but there is limited knowledge about individualized care services (61.8% uncertain). Of the participants, 134 (38.17%) had never used e-pharmacies, and only 24.2% preferred buying medications online, while 75.8% favored physical pharmacies. On a Likert Scale, participants reported moderate levels of satisfaction with e-pharmacies' values/prices and delivery speeds. Many e-pharmacy customers had a positive experience (only 1.1% negative). The findings reveal that service quality, product availability, perceived value, and price could be the potential factors that affect customer satisfaction. Moreover, these factors, along with the provision of personalized care, could shape customers' attitudes toward and perceptions of e-pharmacy.
conclusionsThere is potential for development in e-pharmacy services as seen by the persistence of a preference for traditional pharmacies despite moderate satisfaction ratings. To increase customer satisfaction in Saudi Arabia, we recommend improving personalized care services by raising awareness about e-pharmacy benefits to improve customer satisfaction and adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.