ArticleArthritis research & therapy2024
Comparative analysis of arterial involvement in predominant cranial and isolated extracranial phenotypes of giant cell arteritis using
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Giant Cell Arteritis With Mesenteric Involvement and Superimposed Functional Gut Syndrome: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Glucocorticoid discontinuation and clinical phenotypes in patients with giant cell arteritis: A retrospective cohort study from a fast track clinic.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026Article
- A matter arising: When should inflammatory and autoimmune rheumatic diseases be considered 'early'?European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of patients with low baseline C-reactive protein in giant cell arteritis.Arthritis research & therapy · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate differences in arterial involvement patterns on
methodsA retrospective review of
resultsOf the 140 patients (90 women), 99 (71%) were considered to have a predominantly cranial phenotype, while 41 (29%) had isolated extracranial GCA. Patients with the extracranial phenotype were younger (p = 0.001), had lower TAB positivity (25%), and experienced longer diagnostic delays (p = 0.004). Polymyalgia rheumatica was more common in the extracranial group (p = 0.029), which also showed fewer constitutional symptoms, milder increases in acute phase reactants, and more frequent limb claudication and aortic complications, although these differences were not statistically significant. When comparing arterial involvement on
conclusionSignificant differences in arterial involvement patterns on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.