ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2024
Compensating elastic faults in a torque-assisted knee exoskeleton: functional evaluation and user perception study.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fault Detection, Isolation and Reconfiguration of Four-Bar Mechanism-Based Knee Exoskeleton.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wearable robots are often powered by elastic actuators, which can mimic the intrinsic compliance observed in human joints, contributing to safe and seamless interaction. However, due to their increased complexity, when compared to direct drives, elastic actuators are susceptible to faults, which pose significant challenges, potentially compromising user experience and safety during interaction. In this article, we developed a fault-tolerant control strategy for torque assistance in a knee exoskeleton and investigated user experience during a walking task while emulating faults. We implemented and evaluated the torque control scheme, based on impedance control, for a mechanically adjustable compliance actuator with nonlinear torque-deflection characteristics. Conducted functional evaluation experiments showed that the control strategy is capable of providing support during gait based on a torque profile. A user study was conducted to evaluate the impact of fault severity and compensation on the perception of support, stiffness, comfort, and trust while walking with the exoskeleton. Results from the user study revealed significant differences in participants' responses when comparing support and stiffness levels without fault compensation. In contrast, no significant differences were found when faults were compensated, indicating that fault tolerance can be achieved in practice. Meanwhile, comfort and trust measurements do not seem to depend directly on torque support levels, pointing to other influencing factors that could be considered in future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.