Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39732641›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Exploring key embryonic developmental morphokinetic parameters that affect clinical outcomes during the PGT cycle using time-lapse monitoring systems.

Ran Jiang, Guang Yang, Huihui Wang, Junnan Fang, Jingyi Hu, Tongwei Zhang, Yue Kong, Zhaoting Wu, Xianju Huang, Lin Qi and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Translational Fidelity Decline in the Aging Oocyte and Embryo Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ran Jiang *Reproductive Medical Center, Henan Province Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 East Jianshe Road, Erqi District, Zhengzhou, China.
Guang Yang *Reproductive Medical Center, Henan Province Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 East Jianshe Road, Erqi District, Zhengzhou, China.
Huihui Wang *Reproductive Medical Center, Henan Province Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 East Jianshe Road, Erqi District, Zhengzhou, China.
Junnan Fang *Reproductive Medical Center, Henan Province Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 East Jianshe Road, Erqi District, Zhengzhou, China.
Jingyi HuReproductive Medical Center, Henan Province Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 East Jianshe Road, Erqi District, Zhengzhou, China.
Tongwei ZhangReproductive Medical Center, Henan Province Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 East Jianshe Road, Erqi District, Zhengzhou, China.
Yue KongReproductive Medical Center, Henan Province Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 East Jianshe Road, Erqi District, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhaoting WuReproductive Medical Center, Henan Province Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 East Jianshe Road, Erqi District, Zhengzhou, China.
Xianju HuangReproductive Medical Center, Henan Province Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 East Jianshe Road, Erqi District, Zhengzhou, China.
Lin QiReproductive Medical Center, Henan Province Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 East Jianshe Road, Erqi District, Zhengzhou, China.
Ning SongReproductive Medical Center, Henan Province Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 East Jianshe Road, Erqi District, Zhengzhou, China.
Wenyan SongReproductive Medical Center, Henan Province Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 East Jianshe Road, Erqi District, Zhengzhou, China.
Haixia JinReproductive Medical Center, Henan Province Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 East Jianshe Road, Erqi District, Zhengzhou, China.
Guidong YaoReproductive Medical Center, Henan Province Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, No. 1 East Jianshe Road, Erqi District, Zhengzhou, China. ygdzzu@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China U1904138Provincial and Ministerial co-construction project of Henan Medical Science and Technology Program SBGJ202102098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

research questionIs it possible to predict blastocyst quality, embryo chromosomal ploidy, and clinical pregnancy outcome after single embryo transfer from embryo developmental morphokinetic parameters?

designThe morphokinetic parameters of 1011 blastocysts from 227 patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing were examined. Correlations between the morphokinetic parameters and the quality of blastocysts, chromosomal ploidy, and clinical pregnancy outcomes following the transfer of single blastocysts were retrospectively analyzed.

resultsThe morphokinetic parameters of embryos in the high-quality blastocyst group were significantly shorter than those in the low-quality blastocyst group (p < 0.05). In contrast, the CC2 time was significantly prolonged (p < 0.05). On chromosomal analysis of biopsy blastocysts nourished by trophectoderm cells, in comparison to euploid embryos, aneuploid embryos exhibited significant extensions in tPNa, S3, tSC, tM, tSB, and tB (p < 0.05), with a simultaneous significant reduction in CC2 time (p < 0.05). After adjusting for age and body mass index through logistic regression analysis, late morphokinetic parameters, namely tM (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.93-0.99), tSB (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.90-0.97), and tB (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.90-0.97), emerged as independent risk factors influencing the development of embryos into high-quality blastocysts. S3 (< 12.01 h), t8 (< 62.48 h), and tPB2 (< 3.36 h) were potential predictors of a successful clinical pregnancy after blastocyst transfer.

conclusionMorphokinetic parameters showed correlations with blastocyst quality, chromosomal status, and clinical pregnancy outcomes post-transfer, making them effective predictors for clinical results. Embryos with relatively rapid development tended to exhibit better blastocyst quality, chromosomal ploidy, and improved clinical pregnancy outcomes. The late morphokinetic parameter, S3, demonstrated a strong predictive effect on blastocyst quality, chromosomal ploidy, and clinical pregnancy outcomes.

Indexed as

BlastocystEmbryonic DevelopmentPreimplantation DiagnosisTime-Lapse ImagingAdultAneuploidyFemaleHumansPloidiesPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesSingle Embryo TransferClinical pregnancyEmbryo qualityMorphokinetic parametersPloidyPreimplantation genetic testingTime-lapse monitoring

Identifiers

PMID39732641
PMCPMC11681760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.