Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39732635›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

A qualitative exploration of women's expectations of birth and knowledge of birth interventions following antenatal education.

Anna Davies, Michael Larkin, Lucy Willis, Narendra Mampitiya, Mary Lynch, Miriam Toolan, Abigail Fraser, Kate Rawling, Rachel Plachcinski, Sonia Barnfield and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. What Should Be Discussed When Considering a Vaginal Birth? A Delphi Consensus Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Anna DaviesAcademic Women's Health Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 5 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1UD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0743-6547
Michael LarkinCollege of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3304-7000
Lucy WillisAcademic Women's Health Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 5 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1UD, UK.
Narendra MampitiyaAcademic Women's Health Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 5 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1UD, UK.
Mary LynchAcademic Women's Health Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 5 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1UD, UK.
Miriam ToolanAcademic Women's Health Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 5 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1UD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0779-3897
Abigail FraserNational Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and University of Bristol, Oakfield House, Oakfield Grove, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7741-9470
Kate RawlingPublic Patient Involvement stakeholder ACE Study, University of Bristol, 5 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1UD, UK.
Rachel PlachcinskiNational Childbirth Trust, Brunel House, 11 The Promenade, Clifton Down, Bristol, BS8 3NG, UK.
Sonia BarnfieldNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
Margaret SmithNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Southmead Road, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
Christy BurdenAcademic Women's Health Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 5 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1UD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6409-5238
Abi MerrielAcademic Women's Health Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 5 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1UD, UK. abi.merriel@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0352-2106

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpectations of birth, and whether they are met, influence postnatal psychological wellbeing. Intrapartum interventions, for example induction of labour, are increasing due to a changing pregnant population and evolving evidence, which may contribute to a mismatch between expectations and birth experience. NICE recommends antenatal education (ANE) to prepare women for labour and birth, but there is no mandated UK National Health Service (NHS) ANE curriculum. We aimed to explore women's expectations of childbirth and their understanding of common interventions and complications following NHS and non-NHS ANE.

methodQualitative focus groups were conducted with postnatal women (< 12 months postpartum) aged ≥ 16, who had received antenatal care at a single NHS Trust. A semi-structured topic guide was used to explore birth expectations following attendance at ANE and knowledge of birth interventions and complications. Data were transcribed and thematic analysis was undertaken by at least two researchers.

results46 women (mean age: 33.5years; 81% white British) participated across eight groups. 65% were primiparous, 35% had a caesarean birth. 50% attended NHS ANE and 59% non-NHS ANE. Participants perceived that a 'hierarchy of birth' was presented within ANE classes, where a 'better birth' involved vaginal birth, minimal pain relief and limited intervention. Participants described expectations of control and choice over their birth, though some described being encouraged to be open-minded about the course it may take. Participants identified a mismatch between their expectations and subsequent experiences, which adversely impacted their psychological wellbeing. While participants received information about common birth interventions and complications, limited time spent on these during classes resulted in expectations that they were rare. Participants felt that receiving sensitively presented information about the frequency of interventions could prepare women and support their psychological wellbeing after birth.

conclusionsWomen's expectations of birth are informed by ANE which may precipitate a mismatch between expectations and experience. Better information about risk factors and frequency of labour and birth interventions may support women to develop evidence-informed expectations of birth, reducing the expectation-experience gap, with consequent impact on maternal postnatal wellbeing. A mandatory minimum curriculum for ANE is needed to ensure high-quality education is available to all.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeParturitionPrenatal EducationQualitative ResearchAdultDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal CareState MedicineUnited KingdomYoung AdultAntenatal educationBirth expectationsFocus groupsPsychological wellbeingQualitative

Identifiers

PMID39732635
PMCPMC11682617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.