Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39732633›Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2024

"High specificity of PCR in diagnosing mucocutaneous leshminiasis: a systematic review and meta analysis".

Mohammed Saleh Al-Dhubaibi, Saleh Salem Bahaj, Aref Noman, Waleed Yahya Alkasser, Ahmed Ibrahim AbdElneam, Ghada Farouk Mohammed, Hassan Nawaz, Zeeshan Allana, Sarosh Sher Ali

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mohammed Saleh Al-DhubaibiDepartments of Dermatologym College of Medicine, Shaqra University, Dawadmi, Saudi Arabia.
Saleh Salem BahajDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen. salehbahaj2025@hotmail.com.
Aref NomanDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology (PhD Student), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.
Waleed Yahya AlkasserDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology (PhD Student), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.
Ahmed Ibrahim AbdElneamDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Shaqra University, Dawadmi, Saudi Arabia.
Ghada Farouk MohammedDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology, and Sexology, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Hassan NawazCommunity Medicine, Shaqra University, Dawadmi, Saudi Arabia.
Zeeshan AllanaDepartment of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sarosh Sher AliDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMucocutaneous leishmaniasis (MCL) is a severe form of leishmaniasis causing chronic and destructive lesions. Accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment. Traditional methods, such as the Montenegro skin test is delayed hypersensitivity test. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has emerged as a superior diagnostic tool for detecting Leishmania DNA, offering higher sensitivity and specificity. METHODOLOGY: This meta-analysis adhered to PRISMA guidelines and included studies focusing exclusively on the diagnostic accuracy of PCR for MCL. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases. Inclusion criteria mandated studies with relevant diagnostic accuracy metrics, while those mixing other forms of leishmaniasis or lacking a control group were excluded. Quality was assessed using the STARD checklist, and ensuring a low risk of bias assessed through QUADAS-2 tool.

resultsEight studies were included, showing PCR sensitivity ranging from 50% to 97.1% and consistently high specificity, often reaching 100%. The studies demonstrated a low risk of bias and applicability concerns, supporting the robustness of the findings. Heterogeneity was substantial, necessitating a random-effects model for pooled estimates. INTERPRETATIONS: This analysis confirms PCR's high specificity for MCL diagnosis, despite variable sensitivity. Compared to previous meta-analyses, this study's focus on MCL exclusively provides a more targeted evaluation. Future research should aim to standardize PCR protocols and explore non-invasive sampling techniques to enhance diagnostic accuracy and patient comfort, ultimately improving clinical outcomes for MCL patients.

Indexed as

LeishmaniaLeishmaniasis, MucocutaneousPolymerase Chain ReactionHumansSensitivity and SpecificityDiagnosisLeishmaniasisMucocutaneousPolymerase chain reaction

Identifiers

PMID39732633
PMCPMC11682634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.