ArticleBMJ open2024
Mainstreaming control interventions for neglected tropical diseases into the health system: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe WHO neglected tropical diseases (NTD) roadmap (2021-2030) proposed a shift in approach to addressing NTDs through accountability for impact, implementing integration across NTDs, mainstreaming in national health systems and ensuring country ownership. However, a major challenge has been the dearth of evidence on how to implement this shift in a resource-limited setting. The objective of this scoping review is to understand the extent and type of evidence on the mainstreaming or integration of programmes and/or interventions against NTDs into the national health system.
methodsResearch articles of any methodology, series, evaluations and reports published from 1995 in the English language on any peer-reviewed platforms, and WHO, universities and government or implementing partners websites that report and discuss mainstreaming or integration implementation practices or experiences of any interventions against NTDs into the health system will be included. The main databases searched on 30 October 2024 were Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Global Health (Ovid), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CENTRAL on the Cochrane Library (Wiley), and WHO Global Index Medicus. Following piloting, screening and data extraction will be undertaken independently by at least two people. Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers at each stage of the screening and selection process will be resolved through discussion, or with an additional reviewer/s. Thematic analysis will be conducted guided by the project INTEGRATE framework and the Primary Health Care Performance Initiative conceptual framework. Key information or evidence relevant to the mainstreaming of interventions against NTDs into the health system such as mainstreamed interventions and the level of health system where the mainstreaming occurred, the effectiveness of the mainstreaming, contextual differences in health system organisation between settings, and challenges and promising practices will be summarised. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval will not be sought as our review will only include published data. The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be disseminated at national and international research and programme review platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.