Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39732490›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Assessing the impact of different donor milk treatments on infant health and growth: a systematic review protocol.

Daniel Klotz, Agnieszka Bzikowska-Jura, Marzia Giribaldi, Tanya Cassidy, Laura Cavallarin, Serena Gandino, Karolina Karcz, Chiara Peila, Carolyn Smith, Bartłomiej Walczak and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Daniel KlotzBethel Center for Pediatrics, Department of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care, University Hospital OWL, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Agnieszka Bzikowska-JuraLaboratory of Human Milk and Lactation Research, Department of Medical Biology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Marzia GiribaldiInstitute of Sciences of Food Productions, National Research Council, Grugliasco, Torino, Italy marzia.giribaldi@cnr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3507-7684
Tanya CassidyKathleen Lonsdale Institute for Human Health Research, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.
Laura CavallarinInstitute of Sciences of Food Productions, National Research Council, Grugliasco, Torino, Italy.
Serena GandinoNuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1461-5527
Karolina KarczDepartment and Clinic of Neonatology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4271-2626
Chiara PeilaNeonatal Unit, Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Carolyn SmithBodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Banbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7196-9116
Bartłomiej WalczakInstitute of Applied Social Sciences, University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0346-712X
Aleksandra WesolowskaLaboratory of Human Milk and Lactation Research, Department of Medical Biology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7270-5910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDonor human milk (DHM) is the first alternative if mother's own milk is unavailable or contraindicated. Much DHM research has focused on its nutritional, immunological and biochemical composition in response to various maternal variables, standard human milk banking procedures and storage protocols. The current systematic review protocol, however, aims to systematically gather and analyse existing data pertaining to the impact of these aforementioned factors on the clinical, health-related and developmental outcomes observed in infants fed with DHM. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will apply a predefined search strategy including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Global Index Medicus, CINAHL on Ebscohost, Medline, Embase, Emcare, Pubmed, Global Health on OVID, Google Scholar, clinicaltrials.gov, the WHO International Trials Registry and Platform and the European Union/European Economic Area Clinical Trials Register. No setting, patient population, date or language restrictions will be applied. The search strategy will consist of search words on the key concepts of 'donated human milk' and 'effect on infants'. Published or unpublished primary research studies are eligible for inclusion if there is an abstract available in English. Conference proceedings, animal studies and publications with no original data will be excluded.Authors of unpublished or partially published studies will be contacted and eligible data added if provided. Risk of bias will be evaluated according to CASP using appropriate tools depending on study type (RoB 2, ROBINS-I, Newcastle Ottawa Scale). Data will be synthesised in a quantitative format describing significant results as well as presenting the results of the quality assessment of studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review does not require ethical approval, as we will not collect primary data. The review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated electronically and in print. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024522015.

Indexed as

Infant HealthMilk BanksMilk, HumanChild DevelopmentHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicMeta-AnalysisNeonatal intensive & critical careNEONATOLOGYNUTRITION & DIETETICS

Identifiers

PMID39732490
PMCPMC11683976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.