Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39732481›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

How does organisational culture facilitate uptake of home dialysis? An ethnographic study of kidney centres in England.

Kerry Allen, Karen L Shaw, Jenna L Spry, Lisa Dikomitis, David Coyle, Sarah Damery, James Fotheringham, Mark Lambie, Iestyn P Williams, Simon Davies

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07364292 (Shared Decision Making in Dialysis Modality Selection), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07364292 nacompletednot on this map

Shared Decision Making in Dialysis Modality Selection: a Lived Experience From Nephrologists. A Nationwide Qualitative Study.

TypeinterventionalSponsorErasme University HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled25ConditionsEnd Stage Renal DiseaseArmsQ methodology
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kerry AllenHealth Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK K.Allen@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7661-2340
Karen L ShawInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7120-8595
Jenna L SpryInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6249-4881
Lisa DikomitisCentre for Health Services Studies and Kent and Medway Medical School, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
David CoyleNIHR Devices for Dignity MedTech Co-operative, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Sarah DameryInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3681-8608
James FotheringhamSchool of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Mark LambieSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6285-5368
Iestyn P WilliamsHealth Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Simon DaviesSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5127-4755

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe proportion of people having home dialysis for kidney disease varies considerably by treating centre, socioeconomic deprivation levels in the area and to some extent ethnicity. This study aimed to gain in-depth insights into cultural and organisational factors contributing to this variation in uptake.

designThis is the first ethnographic study of kidney centre culture to focus on home dialysis uptake. The NASSS (non-adoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability) framework was used to map factors that influence the use of home dialysis.

settingWe conducted focused ethnographic fieldwork in four kidney centres in England, with average or high rates of home dialysis use, selected to represent geographic, ethnic and socioeconomic diversity.

participantsObservations of patient consultations, team meetings, patient education and training sessions (n=34); and interviews with staff, patients and carers (n=72).

resultsWe identified three themes that can support the decision to pursue home dialysis: (a)

conclusionsWillingness to pursue dialysis at home relied on patients' and carers' ability to place their confidence in their kidney care teams rather than how services were organised. Our study of kidney centre culture has identified approaches to patient empowerment, access to treatment and readiness for improvement and change that could be incorporated into a service delivery intervention.

Indexed as

Anthropology, CulturalHemodialysis, HomeOrganizational CultureAdultAgedEnglandFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicDialysisHealth EquityPatient-Centered CareQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID39732481
PMCPMC11683977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.