Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39732480›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Monitoring low-value care in medical patients from Swiss university hospitals using a Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) national data stream and patient and public involvement: LUCID study protocol.

Tommaso Guffi, Julien Ehrsam, Marie Débieux, Jean-Benoît Rossel, Marie-Josée Crevier, Jean-Luc Reny, Jerome Stirnemann, Christoph A Meier, Drahomir Aujesky, Stefano Bassetti and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tommaso GuffiDepartment of Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland tommaso.guffi@usz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5129-2158
Julien EhrsamDepartment of Diagnostic, HUG, Geneve, Switzerland.
Marie DébieuxUniversity of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Jean-Benoît RosselUniversity of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Marie-Josée CrevierLausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Luc RenyDepartment of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneve, Switzerland.
Jerome StirnemannHôpitaux Universitaires Genève, Geneve, Switzerland.
Christoph A MeierDivision of Internal Medicine, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Drahomir AujeskyDivision of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital Universitatsspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Stefano BassettiDivision of Internal Medicine, Universitatsspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Carole Elodie AubertGeneral Internal Medicine, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Marie MéanCHUV, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland.
LUCID Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealthcare practices providing minimal or no benefit to recipients have been estimated to represent 20% of healthcare costs. However, defining, measuring and monitoring low-value care (LVC) and its downstream consequences remain a major challenge. The purpose of the National Data Stream (LUCID NDS) is to identify and monitor LVC in medical inpatients using routinely collected hospital data. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol describes a multistep approach to the identification and surveillance of LVC: (1) creating an NDS based on Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) principles using routinely collected hospital data from medical inpatients who signed a general consent for data reuse from 2014 onwards; (2) selecting recommendations applicable to medical inpatients using data from LUCID NDS to develop a comprehensive and robust set of LVC indicators; (3) establishing expert consensus on the most relevant and actionable recommendations to prevent LVC; (4) applying the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy methodology to assess the level of evidence of recommendations; (5) involving patients and the public at various stages of LUCID NDS; and (6) designing monitoring rules within the LUCID NDS and validating quality measures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The ethics committees of all five participating university hospitals (Basel, Bern, Geneva, Lausanne and Zurich) approved LUCID NDS as a national registry on quality of care. We will disseminate our findings in peer-reviewed journals, at professional conferences, and through short reports sent to participating entities and stakeholders; moreover, lay summaries are provided for patients and the broader public on our webpage (www.LUCID-nds.ch).

Indexed as

Hospitals, UniversityHumansPatient ParticipationSwitzerlandHospitalsINTERNAL MEDICINEPatientsQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID39732480
PMCPMC11683918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.