Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39732478›Full record

SynthesisBMJ mental health2024

Components of cognitive-behavioural therapy for mitigating core symptoms in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analys.

Kazuki Matsumoto, Sayo Hamatani, Yoshihiko Kunisato, Yoshifumi Mizuno

Abstract readNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kazuki Matsumoto *Division of Clinical Psychology, Kagoshima University Hospital, Research and Education Assembly Medical and Dental Sciences Area, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan k2782199@kadai.jp sayoh@u-fukui.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-0505-6882
Sayo Hamatani *Research Center for Child Mental Development, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan k2782199@kadai.jp sayoh@u-fukui.ac.jp.
Yoshihiko KunisatoDepartment of Psychology, Senshu University, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan.
Yoshifumi MizunoResearch Center for Child Mental Development, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

questionCognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is frequently implemented for individuals with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It is still unknown which specific components are effective, because CBT is a complex intervention with several components. The objective of this review was to assess the efficacy of CBT components for ADHD. STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS: Building on definitions of the components used in CBT strategies, we conducted network meta-analyses to evaluate the efficacy at both the treatment level (ie, combinations of these components) and the component level (ie, individual component). Primary outcome was treatment response of ADHD core symptoms. Secondary outcomes were total ADHD symptoms, inattention symptoms, hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms and dropout from the treatment. We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library for literature published up to 31 March 2022. This review included only randomised controlled trials.

findings43 trials with 3817 participants were included in the network meta-analyses. Third-wave therapy (OR=4.80, 95% credible interval (CrI) 2.50 to 9.10), behaviour therapy (OR=3.50, 95% CrI 1.70 to 7.30) and CBT (OR=3.10, 95% CrI 1.70 to 5.70) were treatments that demonstrated superior efficacy compared with placebo. The component-level analyses showed organisational strategies (incremental OR (iOR)=2.03, 95% CI 1.27 to 3.24) and third-wave components (iOR=1.95, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.93) were associated with increase in treatment response. Problem-solving techniques (incremental standardised mean difference=0.42, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.83) were associated with a reduction in inattention symptoms.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that the optimal treatment package for ADHD may include organisational strategies, third-wave components and problem-solving techniques. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022323898.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCognitive Behavioral TherapyChildHumansAdult psychiatryChild & adolescent psychiatryData Interpretation, StatisticalPSYCHIATRY

Identifiers

PMID39732478
PMCPMC11683884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.