Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39732475›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

Inequalities in ownership and availability of home-based vaccination records in 82 low- and middle-income countries.

Bianca O Cata-Preta, Thiago M Santos, Andrea Wendt, Luisa Arroyave, Tewodaj Mengistu, Daniel R Hogan, Aluisio J D Barros, Cesar G Victora, M Carolina Danovaro-Holliday

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bianca O Cata-PretaDepartment of Public Health, Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, PR, Brazil bianca.catapreta@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5632-7016
Thiago M SantosSchool of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne Nossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4572-5297
Andrea WendtPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Tecnologia em Saúde, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Luisa ArroyaveNational Collaborating Centre for Infectious Diseases, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0642-8986
Tewodaj MengistuGlobal Health Campus, GAVI the Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3475-3599
Daniel R HoganGlobal Health Campus, GAVI the Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1636-2594
Aluisio J D BarrosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2022-8729
Cesar G VictoraInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
M Carolina Danovaro-HollidayDepartment of Immunization, Vaccines, and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7324-9198

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHome-based records (HBRs) are widely used for recording health information including child immunisations. We studied levels and inequalities in HBR ownership in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) using data from national surveys conducted since 2010.

methodsWe used data from national household surveys (Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS)) from 82 LMICs. 465 060 children aged 6-35 months were classified into four categories: HBR seen by the interviewer; mother/caregiver never had an HBR; mother/caregiver had an HBR that was lost; and reportedly have an HBR that was not seen by the interviewer. Inequalities according to age, sex, household wealth, maternal education, antenatal care and giving birth in an institutional setting were studied, as were associations between HBR ownership and vaccine coverage. Pooled analyses were carried out using country weights based on child populations.

resultsAn HBR was seen for 67.8% (95% CI 67.4% to 68.2%) of the children, 9.2% (95% CI 9.0% to 9.4%) no longer had an HBR, 12.8% (95% CI 12.5% to 13.0%) reportedly had an HBR that was not seen and 10.2% (95% CI 9.9% to 10.5%) had never received one. The lowest percentages of HBRs seen were in Kiribati (22.1%), the Democratic Republic of Congo (24.5%), Central African Republic (24.7%), Chad (27.9%) and Mauritania (35.5%). The proportions of HBRs seen declined with age and were inversely associated with household wealth and maternal schooling. Antenatal care and giving birth in an institutional setting were positively associated with ownership. There were no differences between boys and girls. When an HBR was seen, higher immunisation coverage and lower vaccine dropout rates were observed, but the direction of this association remains unclear.

interpretationHBR coverage levels were remarkably low in many LMICs, particularly among children from the poorest families and those whose mothers had low schooling. Contact with antenatal and delivery care was associated with higher HBR coverage. Interventions are urgently needed to ensure that all children are issued HBRs, and to promote proper storage of such cards by families.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesOwnershipChild, PreschoolFemaleHealth Records, PersonalHumansInfantMaleSocioeconomic FactorsVaccinationVaccination CoverageChild healthImmunisationVaccines

Identifiers

PMID39732475
PMCPMC11683979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.