ArticleBMJ open quality2024
Development and evaluation of a quality improvement educational video on joint contractures for care home staff.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContractures are a debilitating problem for individuals living in long-term care settings. However, there is a lack of education and training among the care staff regarding the identification of risk factors related to contractures and the preventive strategies that can decrease their development or progression. Addressing this knowledge gap has the potential to improve the quality of care provided to residents in care homes.The objective of this quality improvement (QI) project was to investigate the impact of a newly developed educational video on the awareness, knowledge and understanding of contractures among the care staff.
methodsThis QI project involved two sequential Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and employed a pre and post-test design to evaluate the impact of the contracture educational video. Primary outcomes were assessed using paper surveys to capture prevideo and postvideo levels of knowledge and understanding of contractures. Furthermore, both verbal and written feedback from participants were gathered to identify areas of strengths and improvement.
resultsBaseline data revealed that about 56% of the care staff lacked knowledge and understanding of contractures with another 33% reporting possessing only basic knowledge. Following the video intervention, percentage of care staff who reported good knowledge and understanding increased to 67% while 22% reported basic knowledge and understanding of contractures. The care staff suggested changes to the video to improve accessibility of the information, this was incorporated in the refilming of the video.
conclusionThis QI project demonstrated that the introduction of a contracture educational video is a feasible and positively received method of enhancing awareness, knowledge and understanding of contractures among care staff. Educating care staff about the risk factors and prevention strategies for contractures will potentially improve their ability to identify the risk of contractures and help prevent their occurrence, ultimately enhancing the quality of care of the residents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.