Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39732091›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2025

Adolescents' perceptions, experiences, and reactions to "fake" vaping devices.

Benjamin W Chaffee, Claudia Guerra Castillo, Elizabeth T Couch, Janelle Urata, Bonnie Halpern-Felsher, Kristin S Hoeft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benjamin W ChaffeeCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, 95 Kirkham Street Box 1361, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States. Electronic address: benjamin.chaffee@ucsf.edu.
Claudia Guerra CastilloCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, 95 Kirkham Street Box 1361, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
Elizabeth T CouchCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, 95 Kirkham Street Box 1361, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
Janelle UrataDepartment of Orofacial Sciences, University of California San Francisco, 533 Parnassus Avenue, 612B, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
Bonnie Halpern-FelsherREACH Lab, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Stanford University, 3145 Porter Drive, Wing A, Stanford, CA 94304, United States.
Kristin S HoeftCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, 95 Kirkham Street Box 1361, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001872 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI COLLARD, HAROLD R, JACOBY, VANESSA · 2016 to 2025
$112.1M
PROJECT 5: IMPACT OF CHANGING TOBACCO PRODUCT USE ON HEALTHCARE COSTS FOR GENERAL AND VULNERABLE POPULATIONSU54HL147127 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LING, PAMELA MAY · 2018 to 2022
$20.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001872NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL147127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of electronic cigarette (vaping) devices, whether to inhale nicotine, cannabis, or other substances, may pose health risks to adolescents. Those risks could be heightened when a vaping device is "fake," a term we use to include inauthentic, knockoff, counterfeit, and/or adulterated devices, an issue exemplified by the Electronic Cigarette, or Vaping, Product Use-Associated Lung Injury (EVALI) outbreak of 2019-2020.

methodsInvestigators completed in-depth, semi-structured interviews in 2020-2021 with 47 California adolescents (ages 13-17) who used nicotine products. Investigators used thematic analysis to examine participants' perceptions and reactions to fake vaping products, including devices to inhale nicotine or cannabis.

resultsParticipants were familiar with fake vaping devices, which they considered to be low-quality and potentially dangerous, learning about them from peers, their own experience, seeing other young people affected by them, social media, and occasionally from classes in school. Some had heard about health emergencies after using a fake product, but few were specifically familiar with EVALI. Some adolescents were confident that they could detect fake products, although others perceived encountering and using fake devices to be unavoidable. Participants believed that profit motives drove the existence of fake products, especially from informal sellers, and assumed that large companies and government agencies were actively protecting consumers.

conclusionsAdolescents are aware of and may encounter fake vaping devices, potentially exposing them to elevated health risks. Effective public messaging and stronger actions to curb the fake product supply would better protect this population.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsVapingAdolescentCaliforniaFemaleHumansMalePerceptionAdolescentsCounterfeit DrugsMarijuana UseNicotineTobacco ControlTobacco Use DisorderVaping

Identifiers

PMID39732091
PMCPMC11812520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.