Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39731902›Full record

ReviewHealth policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025

Policies and strategies to control antimicrobial resistance in livestock production: A comparative analysis of national action plans in European Union Member States.

Caetano Luiz Beber, Maurizio Aragrande, Massimo Canali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Livestock Antibiotics Use and Antimicrobial Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Integration sites ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caetano Luiz BeberJRC, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Edificio EXPO, c/Inca Garcilaso 3, E-41092 Seville, Spain. Electronic address: caetano.beber@ec.europa.eu.
Maurizio AragrandeDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Via G. Fanin 50, Bologna 40127, Italy.
Massimo CanaliDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Via G. Fanin 50, Bologna 40127, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Policy strategies targeting imprudent antimicrobial use (AMU) in livestock farming have been established at the global and country levels, recognising the risks associated with antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study evaluates the strategies addressing AMU and AMR in animal farms and the food supply chain in EU Member States using a multimethod approach. Our aim is to contribute to the debates surrounding the goals set by the EU Commission and the 'Strategic framework for collaboration on antimicrobial resistance: Together for One Health'. We first review the policies, strategies and specific legislation in the European Union (EU) and Member States about AMU/AMR in livestock production. We then evaluate the national action plans for AMU reduction in the EU using the progressive management pathway tool from the FAO. Finally, we assess the measures that affect AMU reduction by applying a system generalised method of moments to a 8-year panel of the same countries. According to our results, efforts to reduce AMU could be focused on controlling excessive AMU in the pig sector. Further veterinary training on AMU/AMR and improvements in the performance of the veterinary sector, as well as strengthening the development of multisector and One Health collaboration and coordination, can also contribute to achieving better standards in AMU reduction in the livestock sector and, consequently, for AMR control.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnti-Infective AgentsDrug Resistance, MicrobialHealth PolicyLivestockAnimalsEuropean UnionHumansOne HealthAnti-Infective AgentsAnimal health economicsLivestock production antimicrobial resistance policiesLivestock production antimicrobial use policiesOne health

Identifiers

PMID39731902
PMCPMC11797552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.