ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2024
Does methylene blue improve outcomes in patients with post-cardiac surgery vasoplegic syndrome?
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The mystery of methylene blue and its role in managing post-cardiac surgery vasoplegic shock.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Vasoplegic syndrome in cardiac surgery: bridging therapeutic gaps with best practices and future research.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesA best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol described in ICVTS. The question addressed was 'In patients with vasoplegic syndrome following cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, does adjunctive methylene blue improve outcomes including reduced mortality, morbidity and vasopressor requirements?'
methodsOvid Medline was searched using a reported search algorithm. Articles that represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question were selected, tabulated and discussed.
resultsSeven articles were selected: 4 randomized controlled trials and 3 observational studies. Studies were single centre with sample sizes ranging from 30 to 120 patients. Two studies reported a significant reduction in mortality among patients who received adjunctive methylene blue for post-cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) vasoplegic syndrome compared with placebo or standard therapy. Four studies reported improved haemodynamic stability and reduced vasopressor requirements following methylene blue. No studies reported methylene blue-related adverse events or worse outcomes compared to controls or standard therapy. There was significant heterogeneity among the included studies in terms of the timing and dosage of methylene blue therapy as well as the definition of vasoplegic syndrome.
conclusionsThe summation of the best available evidence, which was limited to small clinical trials and observational studies, suggests that the adjunctive administration of methylene blue for refractory post-CPB vasoplegic syndrome is safe and may provide benefits in terms of improved haemodynamic stability, reduction in vasopressor requirements and reduced mortality. Questions surrounding the optimal timing of methylene blue administration, as prophylactic, adjunctive, or rescue therapy for vasoplegic syndrome, require further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.