Observational studyAdvances in therapy2025
Simplified Approach to Managing Newly Diagnosed Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Hypertension in Routine Clinical Practice.
Observational study in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Call to Action: Insights into Hypertension Prevalence and Management in an Urban Sub-Saharan African Population.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of the observational SIMPLE study was to assess real-life effectiveness and safety of a single-pill combination (SPC) of perindopril arginine/amlodipine in a broad range of subjects with newly diagnosed mild-to-moderate hypertension treated in Canadian general practice.
methodsTreatment-naïve participants aged 18-65 years with mild-to-moderate hypertension, whose physicians decided to initiate the perindopril/amlodipine SPC, were recruited from Canadian clinical practice from October 2017 to February 2019. Participants were followed at 3- (M3) and 6-month (M6) visits after treatment initiation. The recommended starting dose of 3.5 mg/2.5 mg once daily was up-titrated, at the discretion of the treating physician, if blood pressure (BP) remained above target at subsequent visits. The primary endpoint was change in mean office systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) at M6.
resultsThe full analysis set included 1179 participants with a mean age of 51.5 ± 8.7 years; 61% were male. Mean SBP/DBP at baseline was 153.4 ± 11.5/94.8 ± 7.7 mmHg. Treatment was initiated at 3.5 mg/2.5 mg in 76.0% participants. Over the 6-month treatment period, significant (P < 0.001) decreases from baseline were observed for SBP (- 22.9 ± 14.5 mmHg) and DBP (- 13.4 ± 9.1 mmHg), with 70.2% of participants achieving their BP target. Across all perindopril/amlodipine SPC dose groups, 61.4% of participants achieved BP targets at M3; mean SBP was reduced by 20.8 ± 14.7 mmHg and DBP by 11.7 ± 9.2 mmHg (both P < 0.001). Analysis by baseline subgroup revealed significant BP reductions across age groups, sex, hypertension grades, and diabetes status. Participants with Grade 2 hypertension had a significantly greater decrease than those with Grade 1 (P < 0.001). Treatment with the SPC was well tolerated, and in the 6.1% with treatment-related adverse events, the majority were mild to moderate. High (99%) self-reported adherence (< 20 missed doses) in the 49.4% with available data and high physician satisfaction with treatment (82%) were reported.
conclusionData from routine Canadian clinical practice indicate that a perindopril/amlodipine SPC is associated with significant BP reductions from baseline in a broad range of participants with different cardiovascular risk factors and may represent an appropriate first-line treatment for subjects with newly diagnosed hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.