Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39731627›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2025

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy with Autologous Fascia Lata.

David Hennes, Victoria Buckley, Anna Rosamilia

Erratum issuedAbstract readCase ReportsVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David HennesRitchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia. David.hennes@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1524-5970
Victoria BuckleyPelvic Floor Disorders Unit, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Anna RosamiliaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisAutologous fascia lata has been increasingly utilised in pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries such as sacrocolpopexy and sacrohysteropexy. This case highlights sacrohysteropexy with autologous fascia lata as a promising option for women with advanced uterovaginal prolapse who wish to preserve their uterus and avoid synthetic mesh.

methodsWe report the case of a 65-year-old woman with stage 3 pelvic organ prolapse following one forceps and one spontaneous vaginal delivery. She presented with cervical-dominant prolapse (6 cm beyond the hymen) and a widened genital hiatus. She was initially managed with a Gellhorn pessary for 7 months, which was removed before surgery. Preoperative findings included prolapse of the cervix, anterior, and posterior vaginal walls (+ 1 cm distal to the hymen). A robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with autologous fascia lata was performed.

resultsThe 120-min procedure, conducted by a certified urogynaecologist, began with harvesting a 12 × 4 cm autologous fascia lata graft from the left thigh. The graft site was closed with 2-0 absorbable sutures and supported with a compression bandage for 4 weeks. The graft was secured to the cervix and anterior longitudinal ligament through laparoscopic dissection and robot-assisted suturing. No perioperative complications occurred, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 2. At 1-year follow-up, there was no recurrence of prolapse.

conclusionsSacrohysteropexy using autologous fascia lata is a feasible and effective alternative to synthetic mesh, providing an additional surgical treatment option for women in settings where synthetic polypropylene meshes are not approved, contraindicated, or an unacceptable option.

Indexed as

Fascia LataGynecologic Surgical ProceduresLaparoscopyPelvic Organ ProlapseRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedFemaleHumansTransplantation, AutologousApical prolapseFascia lataPelvic organ prolapseRobotic surgerySacrocolpopexySacrohysteropexy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.