ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2024
An effective surgical educational system in the era of robotic surgery: "Double-Surgeon Technique" in robotic gastrectomy for minimally invasive surgery.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal assessment of quality-of-life after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026Article
- A modified Delphi consensus on fusion (laparoscopic and robotic) approaches to colorectal surgery in Asia-Pacific.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Is high-quality robotic surgery a solo performance by the console surgeon?Gastroenterology report · 2026Article
- Robot-Assisted Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy for an Epithelial Cyst Arising from an Intrapancreatic Accessory Spleen: A Case Report.Surgical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeGastric cancer (GC) remains a major malignancy. Robotic gastrectomy (RG) has gained popularity due to various advantages. Despite those advantages, many hospitals lack the necessary equipment for RG and are still performing laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) due to its established minimal invasiveness and safety.
methodsThis study assessed the effectiveness of the "Double-Surgeon Technique" (DST) for improving surgical education and proficiency with LG. The DST involves both a console-side surgeon and a patient-side surgeon working actively in RG, enhancing the skill acquisition needed for LG and potentially reducing surgical time. Assessment of this method was performed by surgical time, and cases were divided into three groups: first half (Phase 1: P1) and second half (P2) before the introduction of DST, and after the introduction of DST (P3).
resultsTwo surgical trainees were trained using the DST. The learning curve in both reached a plateau in P2, but descended again in P3. For one trainee, surgical time for P3 was significantly reduced compared to P1 (p = 0.001) and P2 (p = 0.0027) despite the intervals between laparoscopic distal gastrectomy as the main surgeon in P3 being significantly longer than in P2 (p = 0.0094). Other surgical results in both trainees did not differ significantly. Further, no difference in induction phase results of RG were evident between surgeons and trainees with or without DST experience.
conclusionSurgical education using the DST could be effective in the current context of the need for RG and LG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.