ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Comparing supine CT scanogram and standing long-leg radiograph for postoperative alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanical Axis Deviation Angle Versus Hip-Knee-Ankle Angle in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Correlation and Reliability.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAchieving precise postoperative alignment is critical for the long-term success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Long-leg standing radiograph (LLR) at 6 weeks post-op is the gold standard for assessing alignment, but its reliance on weight-bearing and positioning makes it less practical in the early postoperative period. Supine computed tomography scanogram (CTS) offers a potential alternative. This study compares CTS and LLR in patients undergoing TKA with patient-specific valgus correction angles (VCA).
methodsA prospective study of 108 knees from 57 patients undergoing primary TKA was conducted. CTS was performed on postoperative day three in a supine non-weight-bearing position, and LLR at six weeks in an upright standing position. Coronal alignment was assessed using hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and compared using Bland-Altman plots, paired-samples t-tests, and Cohen's d.
resultsCTS showed 57% of knees were within 3° of neutral alignment, while LLR showed 61%. The mean difference between modalities was 0.52° (SD, 3.56°; p = 0.07). Inter-observer reliability was excellent for both CTS and LLR (all ICCs > 0.9).
conclusionWhile CTS provides a useful alternative for early postoperative alignment assessment-particularly in situations where a standing LLR is not feasible-the observed variability suggests that LLR remains the more reliable modality when precise alignment is critical. Surgeons should therefore consider CTS as an adjunct tool for early decision-making or non-ambulatory patients in the immediate postoperative setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, Prospective Comparative Study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39731584What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.