Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39731470›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2025

Family genetic risk communication and reverse cascade testing in the BabySeq project.

Melissa K Uveges, Hadley Stevens Smith, Stacey Pereira, Casie Genetti, Amy L McGuire, Alan H Beggs, Robert C Green, Ingrid A Holm, BabySeq Project Team

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Melissa K UvegesBoston College, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Chestnut Hill, MA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA. Electronic address: uveges@bc.edu.
Hadley Stevens SmithCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Precision Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA; Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Stacey PereiraCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Casie GenettiDivision of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Amy L McGuireCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Alan H BeggsDivision of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Robert C GreenHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA; The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA.
Ingrid A HolmDivision of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
BabySeq Project Team

Funding

Genetic Analysis and Manipulation Core (GAEC)P50HD105351 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI SCOTT Loren POMEROY, MUSTAFA SAHIN · 2021 to 2026
$9.4M
Genome Sequence-Based Screening for Childhood Risk and Newborn IllnessU19HD077671 · NICHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BEGGS, ALAN H., GREEN, ROBERT C. · 2013 to 2018
$6.1M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105351NICHD NIH HHS U19 HD077671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGenomic sequencing of newborns can initiate disease surveillance and therapy for children and may identify at-risk relatives through reverse cascade testing. We explored genetic risk communication and reverse cascade testing among families of newborns who underwent exome sequencing and were identified as having a risk for an autosomal dominant disease.

methodsWe conducted semistructured interviews with parents of newborns enrolled in the BabySeq Project who had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant associated with an autosomal dominant childhood- and/or adult-onset disease returned. We used directed content analysis to derive themes.

resultsFrom 11 families, all first-degree relatives (n = 32, 100%), 29 second-degree relatives (76%), and 26 third-degree relatives (43%) were informed of their risk. All parents (n = 22, 69% of first-degree relatives), 4 (11%) second-degree relatives, and 1 (2%) third-degree relatives underwent cascade testing. Most parents preferred to handle risk communication themselves. Parents with positive cascade testing but no associated symptoms were less inclined to share findings with relatives but highly motivated to share results if the variant's associated disease severity was high, as perceived with adult-onset conditions. One new subtheme, family member traits, was identified and defined as a relative's propensity to anxiety/concern after risk communications but did not diminish risk communication.

conclusionFindings can inform more effective notification and testing practices for families of newborns at risk for hereditary genetic conditions.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingAdultCommunicationExome SequencingFamilyFemaleGenetic CounselingHumansInfant, NewbornMaleParentsCascade testingGenetic risk communicationPediatricsQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID39731470
PMCPMC12264819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.