ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2025
A descriptive examination of rurality in the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes Cohort: Implications, illustrations, and future directions.
Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The social determinants of health-Rurality and pregnancy.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Cohort has enrolled over 60,000 children to examine how early environmental factors (broadly defined) are associated with key child health outcomes. The ECHO Cohort may be well-positioned to contribute to our understanding of rural environments and contexts, which has implications for rural health disparities research. The present study examined the outcome of child obesity to not only illustrate the suitability of ECHO Cohort data for these purposes but also determine how various definitions of rural and urban populations impact the presentation of findings and their interpretation.
methodsThis analysis uses data from children in the ECHO Cohort study who had residential address information between January 2010 and October 2023, including a subset who also had height and weight data. Several rural-urban classification schemes were examined with and without collapsing into binary rural/urban groupings (ie, the Rural-Urban Continuum Codes, 2010 Rural-Urban Commuting Area [RUCA] Codes, and Urban Influence Codes).
findingsVarious rural/urban definitions and classification schemes produce similar obesity prevalence (17%) when collapsed into binary categories (rural vs urban) and for urban participants in general. When all categories within a classification scheme are examined, however, the rural child obesity prevalence ranges from 5.8% to 24%.
conclusionsCollapsing rural-urban classification schemes into binary groupings erases nuance and context needed for interpreting findings, ultimately impacting health disparities research. Future work should leverage both individual- and community-level datasets to provide context, and all categories of classification schemes should be used when examining rural populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.