ArticleThoracic cancer2025
Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Plus Blue Dye for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02869815 (Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using the Navigation of the Combination of Indocyanine and Blue Dye in Patients With Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using the Navigation of the Combination of Indocyanine and Blue Dye in Patients With Breast Cancer
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ethnic disparities in survival and progression among EGFR-mutated adenocarcinoma of lung cancer patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Pooled it
- Navigating lymphatic drainage uncertainty in abdominal ectopic breast cancer: a novel application of indocyanine green fluorescence-a case report and literature review.International cancer conference journal · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using radioisotope tracer plus blue dye is the gold standard after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in initially cN1 breast cancer patients, but clinical use still has limitations. This study aims to examine diagnostic performance of dual indocyanine green (ICG) and methylene blue tracing for SLNB in patients who have completed NAC for breast cancer with initially cN1 disease.
methodsAdult women (20-80 years of age) scheduled to undergo NAC for biopsy-proven cT0-3N1M0 primary invasive breast cancer were consecutively enrolled in this prospective, multicenter, cohort study. Upon the completion of NAC, SLNB was conducted using ICG and methylene blue, followed by axillary lymph node dissection. The primary outcome was the detection rate (DR); secondary outcomes included the false-negative rate (FNR) and adverse events associated with the use of tracers.
resultsA total of 156 patients were enrolled; all underwent SLNB after NAC. The median number of lymph nodes retrieved during SLNB was 3 (range: 0-11). The DR was 97.4% (152/156; 95% CI, 93.6%-99.0%). The FNR was 6.7% (4/60; 95% CI, 2.6%-15.9%). Negative predictive value was 95.7% (88/92; 95% CI, 89.4%-98.3%). In the subgroup analysis stratified by ycN status, FNR was 4.0% (1/25; 95% CI, 0.7%-19.5%) and 8.6% (3/35; 95% CI, 3.0%-22.4%) in the ycN0 and ycN+ subgroups, respectively. No allergic reaction was reported.
conclusionsSLNB with ICG plus methylene blue achieved a high DR and a very low FNR in breast cancer patients with initially cN1 disease.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/), NCT02869815.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.