ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2024
The association between nutrition risk status assessment and hospital mortality in Chinese older inpatients: a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe association between nutritional risk status assessment and hospital mortality in older patients remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between nutritional risk on admission and in-hospital mortality, and explore the best Nutritional Risk Status Screening 2002 (NRS2002) threshold for predicting in-hospital mortality of older inpatients in China.
methodThe elderly inpatients were recruited from a hospital in Hunan Province, China. Nutritional risk was screened and assessed using the NRS2002. Logistic regression was used to analyze whether NRS2002 scores were independently associated with hospital mortality, and the results were expressed as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to determine the best NRS2002 threshold for predicting in-hospital mortality in elderly inpatients. And 500 bootstrap re-samplings were performed for ROC analysis.
resultIn total, 464 elderly inpatients completed the survey (15 of whom died, 205 males and 259 females, mean age = 72.284 ± 5.626 years). Multifactorial analysis revealed that age, the NRS2002 score, and length of hospital stay significantly influenced in-hospital mortality among older inpatients (P < 0.05). The results also showed that higher NRS2002 scores were associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality in both the unadjusted (OR = 1.731,95%CI = 1.362-2.20, P < 0.0001), adjusted model I (OR = 1.736, 95% CI = 1.354-2.206, P < 0.0001) and model II (OR = 1.602, 95% CI = 1.734-2.488, P = 0.0005). The optimal NRS2002 threshold for predicting in-hospital mortality in older inpatients was 3.5, with the largest ROC area of 0.84.
conclusionOur findings indicated that nutritional risk was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality, with a cut-off value of 3.50 for the NRS2002 nutritional risk assessment being more appropriate than a cut-off value of 3.0.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.