Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39731195›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2024

Hybrid Service Delivery for voluntary, community and social enterprise organisations working with adults with learning disabilities and/or autism: a realist review protocol.

Danielle Varley, Kris Southby, Joanne Trigwell, Sally Sj Brown, Nicola Lines, Amy Hearn, Anne-Marie Bagnall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Danielle VarleyCentre for Health Promotion Research, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Kris SouthbyCentre for Health Promotion Research, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Joanne TrigwellCentre for Health Promotion Research, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Sally Sj BrownCentre for Health Promotion Research, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Nicola Lines, Pyramid, Leeds, UK.
Amy Hearn100% Digital Leeds, Leeds City Council and NHS (Leeds) West Yorkshire ICB, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Anne-Marie BagnallCentre for Health Promotion Research, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK. A.Bagnall@leedsbeckett.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelivery of health and care services using a combination of remote and/or in-person channels and digital and/or traditional tools (Hybrid Service Delivery, HSD) is increasingly seen as a way of improving quality and affordability, improving access, personalisation and sustainability, and reducing inequalities. Across the voluntary, community and social enterprise sector (VCSE), using a combination of remote and/or in-person channels and digital and/or traditional tools (HSD) has enabled the essential provision of services for people who have learning disabilities and/or autistic (LDA). However, it is unclear how different tools and channels have been used, what worked well or not well, for whom, and in what circumstances. The aim of this realist review is to explore how VCSE organisations can effectively use digital technologies alongside or instead of in-person activity to provide social care services to adults with learning disabilities and/or autism. This review protocol is presented in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol (PRISMA-P).

methodsWe will conduct a participatory realist review. Following realist review methodology, and involving people with LDA and organisations who deliver services to them, we will define the scope of the review/theory development, search for and appraise evidence, extract and synthesise findings, and develop the narrative. Using a developed strategy, electronic databases (Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, SCOPUS, Social Science Citation Index and Social Policy and Practice) will be searched. A data extraction table will be used to assist in sifting, sorting and organising relevant information from identified studies. For each proposition statement, relevant data from the identified literature will be synthesised and compared with the proposed theory to develop an understanding of how, why and when hybrid delivery works in different settings with different populations. DISCUSSION: This review aims to collate and synthesise evidence relating to hybrid service delivery in VCSE organisations to provide social care services to LDA adults. By conducting a participatory realist review, we anticipate that the findings will lead to a greater understanding of contextual factors and therefore more relevant recommendations. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024457161.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderLearning DisabilitiesAdultDelivery of Health CareHumansSocial WorkSystematic Reviews as TopicTelemedicineAutismDigitalHealth and social careHybrid service deliveryLearning disabilitiesRealist reviewVoluntary and community sector

Identifiers

PMID39731195
PMCPMC11673684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.