Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39731183›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2024

Definitions, epidemiology, and outcomes of persistent/chronic critical illness: a scoping review for translation to clinical practice.

Hiroyuki Ohbe, Kasumi Satoh, Takaaki Totoki, Atsushi Tanikawa, Kasumi Shirasaki, Yoshihide Kuribayashi, Miku Tamura, Yudai Takatani, Hiroyasu Ishikura, Kensuke Nakamura and 1 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Long-term survival of patients with persistent critical illness in Australia and New Zealand; a retrospective registry-based cohort study.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hiroyuki OhbeDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.
Kasumi SatohDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-1 Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan.
Takaaki TotokiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan.
Atsushi TanikawaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.
Kasumi ShirasakiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashicho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan.
Yoshihide KuribayashiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, 1-1 Idaigaoka, Hasamacho, Yufu, Oita, 879-5593, Japan.
Miku TamuraDepartment of Pharmacy, Funabashi Municipal Medical Center, 1-21-1 Kanasugi, Funabashi city, Chiba, Japan.
Yudai TakataniDepartment of Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Hiroyasu IshikuraDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Center, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, 2 Otowachinji-cho, Yamashina-ku, Kyoto, 607-8062, Japan.
Kensuke NakamuraDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Yokohama City University Hospital, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004, Japan. mamashockpapashock@yahoo.co.jp.
J-STAD (JAPAN Sepsis Treatment and Diagnosis) Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical advances in intensive care units (ICUs) have resulted in the emergence of a new patient population-those who survive the initial acute phase of critical illness, but require prolonged ICU stays and develop chronic critical symptoms. This condition, often termed Persistent Critical Illness (PerCI) or Chronic Critical Illness (CCI), remains poorly understood and inconsistently reported across studies, resulting in a lack of clinical practice use. This scoping review aims to systematically review and synthesize the existing literature on PerCI/CCI, with a focus on definitions, epidemiology, and outcomes for its translation to clinical practice.

methodsA scoping review was conducted using MEDLINE and Scopus, adhering to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Peer-reviewed original research articles published until May 31, 2024 that described adult PerCI/CCI in their definitions of patient populations, covariates, and outcomes were included. Data on definitions, epidemiology, and outcomes were extracted by a data charting process from eligible studies and synthesized.

resultsNinety-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these studies, 64 used the term CCI, 18 used PerCI, and 17 used other terms. CCI definitions showed greater variability, while PerCI definitions remained relatively consistent, with an ICU stay ≥ 14 days for CCI and ≥ 10 days for PerCI being the most common. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of PerCI/CCI among the denominators of "all ICU patients", "sepsis", "trauma", and "COVID-19" showed 11% (95% confidence interval 10-12%), 28% (22-34%), 24% (15-33%), and 35% (20-50%), respectively. A meta-analysis of in-hospital mortality was 27% (26-29%) and that of one-year mortality was 45% (32-58%). Meta-analyses of the prevalence of CCI and PerCI showed 17% (16-18%) and 18% (16-20%), respectively, and those for in-hospital mortality were 28% (26-30%) and 26% (24-29%), respectively. Functional outcomes were generally poor, with many survivors requiring long-term care.

conclusionsThis scoping review synthesized many studies on PerCI/CCI, highlighting the serious impact of PerCI/CCI on patients' long-term outcomes. The results obtained underscore the need for consistent terminology with high-quality research for PerCI/CCI. The results obtained provide important information to be used in discussions with patients and families regarding prognosis and care options.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessChronic DiseaseHumansIntensive Care UnitsChronic critical illnessIntensive care unitPersistent critical illnessScoping review

Identifiers

PMID39731183
PMCPMC11681689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.