ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Identification of confounders and estimating the causal effect of place of birth on age-specific childhood vaccination.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Cautionary Note for Plasmode Simulation Studies in the Setting of Causal Inference.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn causal analyses, some third factor may distort the relationship between the exposure and the outcome variables under study, which gives spurious results. In this case, treatment groups and control groups that receive and do not receive the exposure are different from one another in some other essential variables, called confounders.
methodPlace of birth was used as exposure variable and age-specific childhood vaccination status was used as outcome variables. Three approaches of confounder selection techniques such as all pre-treatment covariates, outcome cause covariates, and common cause covariates were proposed. Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate the propensity score for inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) confounder adjustment techniques. The proportional odds model was used to estimate the causal effect of place of birth on age-specific childhood vaccination. To validate the result obtained from observed data, we used a plasmode simulation of resampling 1000 samples from actual data 500 times.
resultOutcome cause and common cause confounder identification techniques gave comparable results in terms of treatment effect in the plasmode data. However, outcome causes that contain common causes and predictors of the outcome confounder identification gave relatively better treatment effect results. The treatment effect result in the IPTW confounder adjustment method was better than that of the regression adjustment method. The effect of place of birth on log odds of cumulative probability of age-specific childhood vaccination was 0.36 with odds ratio of 1.43 for higher level vaccination status.
conclusionIt is essential to use plasmode simulation data to validate the reproducibility of the proposed methods on the observed data. It is important to use outcome-cause covariates to adjust their confounding effect on the outcome. Using inverse probability treatment weighting gives unbiased treatment effect results as compared to the regression method of confounder adjustment. Institutional delivery increases the likelihood of childhood vaccination at the recommended schedule.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.