Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39731122›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2024

College students' disciplinary expertise and their entrepreneurial intentions: an exploratory study based on foreign language majors with experience in innovation and entrepreneurship training programs.

Xuyang Dong, Nan Fang, Long Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xuyang DongCollege of International Studies, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, 314001, China.
Nan FangSchool of Foreign Studies, Shaoguan University, Shaoguan, 512005, China.
Long YeSchool of Foreign Studies, Shaoguan University, Shaoguan, 512005, China. bobyee@sgu.edu.cn.

Funding

the Ministry of Education's Supply and Demand Matching Employment and Talent Cultivation Project 2024010465537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taking foreign language majors with experience in innovation and entrepreneurship training program (IETP) as samples, this study investigates the influence of disciplinary expertise on entrepreneurial intention. Based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB), a model was designed to examine the relationships among entrepreneurial intentions, perceived behavioral control, attitude toward entrepreneurship, subjective norms, IETP experience, foreign language self-efficacy and cultural intelligence. The data were collected through questionnaires and Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was adopted to test the hypotheses. The results show that: (1) perceived behavioral control and attitude toward entrepreneurship are sound predictors of entrepreneurial intentions but the influence of subjective norms on entrepreneurial intentions is insignificant; (2) IETP experience is directly related with perceived behavioral control and indirectly related with entrepreneurial intentions; (3) indicators of participants' disciplinary expertise such as foreign language self-efficacy and cultural intelligence are directly related with IETP experience and indirectly related with entrepreneurial intentions. These six variables included in the research model account for 53.4% of the variance of entrepreneurial intentions.

Indexed as

EntrepreneurshipIntentionStudentsAdultFemaleHumansLanguageMaleSelf EfficacySurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung AdultCultural intelligenceDisciplinary expertiseEntrepreneurial intentionsForeign language self-efficacyInnovation and entrepreneurship training programs

Identifiers

PMID39731122
PMCPMC11681759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.