ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Reusing routine electronic health record data for nationwide COVID-19 surveillance in nursing homes: barriers, facilitators, and lessons learned.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAt the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, little was known about the spread of COVID-19 in Dutch nursing homes while older people were particularly at risk of severe symptoms. Therefore, attempts were made to develop a nationwide COVID-19 repository based on routinely recorded data in the electronic health records (EHRs) of nursing home residents. This study aims to describe the facilitators and barriers encountered during the development of the repository and the lessons learned regarding the reuse of EHR data for surveillance and research purposes.
methodsUsing inductive content analysis, we reviewed 325 documents written and saved during the development of the COVID-19 repository. This included meeting minutes, e-mails, notes made after phone calls with stakeholders, and documents developed to inform stakeholders. We also assessed the fitness for purpose of the data by evaluating the completeness, plausibility, conformity, and timeliness of the data.
resultsKey facilitators found in this study were: 1) inter-organizational collaboration to create support; 2) early and close involvement of EHR software vendors; and 3) coordination and communication between partners. Key barriers that hampered the fitness of EHR data for surveillance were: 1) changes over time in national SARS-CoV-2 testing policy; 2) differences between EHR systems; 3) increased workload in nursing homes and lack of perceived urgency; 4) uncertainty regarding the legal requirements for extracting EHR data; 5) the short notice at which complete and understandable information about the repository had to be developed; and 6) lack of clarity about the differences between various COVID-19 monitors.
conclusionsDespite the urgent need for information on the spread of SARS-CoV-2 among nursing home residents, setting up a repository based on EHR data proved challenging. The facilitators and barriers found in this study affected the extent to which the data could be used. We formulated nine lessons learned for developing future repositories based on EHR data for surveillance and research purposes. These lessons were in three main areas: legal framework, contextual circumstances, and quality of the data. Currently, these lessons are being applied in setting up a new registry in the nursing home sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.