ArticleDiagnostic pathology2024
Combined immunohistochemistry of PRAME and p16 in the differentiation of melanocytic neoplasms, with a detailed focus on acral lesions.
Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pregnancy-Associated Melanoma: A Molecular Reappraisal of the Hormonal Hypothesis, Illustrated by a Postpartum-Persistent Melanoma In Situ.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIsolated immunohistochemical indicators are limited to diagnose melanocytic neoplasms. This retrospective study is to assess the diagnostic value of combined immunohistochemical analysis targeting preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) and p16 in melanocytic neoplasms, with a detailed focus on arcal lesions.
methodsThis was a single center cohort study from January 2022 to June 2023. A total of 165 identified cases were collected, including 112 melanomas (MMs) and 53 melanocytic nevi, which were composed of 122 acral samples and 43 non-acral samples. Immunohistochemistry(IHC) for both PRAME and p16 was performed in these cases, which was subsequently statistically analyzed to assess the diagnosis ability of PRAME and p16.
resultsIn total samples, the sensitivity and specificity of PRAME(+) for MM are 82.1% and 94.3% (AUC = 0.882, 95%CI:0.827-0.938), while of p16(-) for MM are 31.25% and 94.3% (AUC = 0.628, 95%CI:0.542-0.714); PRAME(+)/p16(-) (meaning as PRAME(+) or p16(-)) displayed a sensitivity and specificity of 85.7% and 88.7% for MM (AUC = 0.872, 95%CI:0.810-0.934), while PRAME(+) &p16(-) (meaning as PRAME(+) and p16(-)) revealed a sensitivity and specificity of 27.7% and 100% in MM (AUC = 0.638, 95%CI:0.555-0.722). In acral samples, PRAME(+)/p16(-) exhibited a specificity of 94.7% and a sensitivity of 86.9% for MM (AUC = 0.908, 95%CI: 0.849-0.968), with sensitivities of 90.9% for invasive MM and 82.5% for preinvasive MM, respectively; The sensitivity and specificity of PRAME(+) &p16(-) for MM is 22.6% and 100% (AUC = 0.613, 95%CI: 0.513-0.714) respectively. In non-acral samples, the sensitivity and specificity of PRAME(+)/p16(-) for MM are 82.1% and 73.3% (AUC = 0.777, 95%CI: 0.622-0.933), while of PRAME(+) &p16(-) are 42.9% and 100% (AUC = 0.714, 95%CI:0.564-0.864).
conclusionCombined IHC of PRAME and p16 contributes to discriminating melanocytic neoplasms, especially for in situ acral MM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.