ArticleReproductive health2024
Collateral damage: the overlooked reproductive health crisis in conflict zones.
Article in Reproductive health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Maternal and neonatal outcomes in Gaza amid armed hostilities in 2025.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Observational
- Woman-centred care in conflict-affected and fragile states: a scoping review of policy integration and implementation gaps in the greater horn of Africa.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Understanding contraception-use intentions among women of reproductive age not currently using contraceptives in sub-Saharan Africa: key insights from Demographic and Health Surveys.International health · 2026Article
- Abortion in conflict zones: moral responsibilities of humanitarian agencies in providing safe abortion care.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
- Free but declining: the paradox of contraceptive uptake in Burkina Faso.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Health impacts of armed conflict in Ethiopia: a scoping review of evidence from 2018 to 2023.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Intention to switch from short-acting to long-acting reversible contraceptives among refugee women in Ethiopia: application of the theory of planned behavior.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025Article
- Risk factors for neural tube defects in the war and siege-affected tigray regional state of ethiopia: a case-control study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Regional disparities and sociodemographic determinants of intention to use contraceptives among Somali women: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2020 SDHS.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025Article
- Editorial: Access and barriers to reproductive health services among immigrants and populations in conflict zones.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conflict-affected regions face severe reproductive health challenges that disproportionately impact adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) and children, who are especially vulnerable due to the breakdown of healthcare systems and limited access to essential services. AGYW are at heightened risk due to restricted access to family planning, prenatal care, and emergency obstetric services, while children face malnutrition, disease outbreaks, and developmental delays. These challenges have profound long-term consequences for both their physical and psychological well-being. This commentary explores the underlying causes of reproductive health challenges in conflict zones, including the collapse of healthcare infrastructure, increased sexual violence, forced displacement, and the specific vulnerabilities AGYW and children face. The commentary underscores the urgent need for interventions that address both immediate and systemic gaps in reproductive healthcare, particularly for AGYW and children. A unique policy framework is proposed, integrating emergency reproductive health interventions-such as mobile clinics and emergency health kits-with long-term strategies for rebuilding healthcare systems. The framework emphasizes gender-sensitive, context-specific approaches and sustained investments in healthcare infrastructure to effectively address these challenges and mitigate the long-term effects on vulnerable populations. By aligning with global and regional policy frameworks, including the Inter-Agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Crises (IAWG) and the Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP), the commentary advocates for embedding reproductive health into all phases of humanitarian action-from emergency response to recovery. This integrated approach provides actionable recommendations to improve the well-being of AGYW, children, and other vulnerable populations, fostering sustainable advancements in reproductive health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.