ArticleBMC cancer2024
Gene expression profiling for the diagnosis of male breast cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer of unknown primary: the evolution of tissue of origin identification in the artificial intelligence era.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Oestrogen receptor phosphorylation profiles and in silico PAM50 subtyping reflect sexual dimorphism in breast cancer.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2026Article
- Current Perspectives on Non-Metastatic Male Breast Cancer: Genetics, Biology, and Treatment Advances: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMale breast cancer (MBC) is a rare malignancy, but its global incidence has shown a notable increase in recent decades. Factors such as limited health literacy, inadequate health education, and reluctance to seek medical attention contribute to the late-stage diagnosis of most MBC patients. Consequently, there is an urgent need for a highly specific and sensitive diagnostic approach to MBC.
methodsThis retrospective study enrolled 20 patients with 30 surgical or biopsy MBC specimens from August 2020 to August 2023. The 90-gene expression assay was performed to determine the tissue of origin. Predicted tumor types were then compared to the reference diagnosis for accuracy calculation. The differentially expressed genes were identified between male and female breast cancer.
resultThe 90-gene expression assay demonstrated an overall accuracy of 96.7% (29/30) when compared with the pathological diagnosis. For primary, lymph node metastatic, and distant metastatic tumors, the accuracies were 100% (15/15), 90.9% (10/11), and 100% (4/4), respectively. Five genes (RPS4Y1, PI15, AZGP1, PRRX1, and AGR2) were up-regulated, and six (XIST, PIGR, SFRP1, PLA2G2A, S100A2, and CHI3L1) were down-regulated in MBC.
conclusionOur findings highlight the promising performance of the 90-gene expression assay in accurately identifying the tumor origin in MBC. Incorporating this assay into pathological diagnoses has the potential to empower oncologists with precision treatment options, ultimately enhancing the care and outcomes for patients with MBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.