ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2024
Adaptive or non-adaptive? Cranial evolution in a radiation of miniaturized day geckos.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inter- and intraspecific morphometric divergences in a Seychelles endemic gecko genus.BMC ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lygodactylus geckos represent a well-documented radiation of miniaturized lizards with diverse life-history traits that are widely distributed in Africa, Madagascar, and South America. The group has diversified into numerous species with high levels of morphological similarity. The evolutionary processes underlying such diversification remain enigmatic, because species live in different ecological biomes, ecoregions and microhabitats, while suggesting strikingly high levels of homoplasy. To underscore this evolutionary pattern, here we explore the shape variation of skull elements (i.e., cranium, jaw and inner ear) using 3D geometric morphometrics and phylogenetic comparative methods on computed tomography scans (CT-scan) of a sample encompassing almost all recognized taxa within Lygodactylus. The results of this work show that skull and inner ear shape variation is low (i.e., there is high overlapping on the morphospace) across geographic regions, macrohabitats and lifestyles, implying extensive homoplasy. Furthermore, we also found a strong influence of allometry shaping cranial variation both at intra and interspecific levels, suggesting a major constraint underlying skull architecture, probably as a consequence of its miniaturization. The remaining variation that is not allometric is independent of phylogeny and ecological adaptation and can probably be interpreted as the result of intrinsic developmental plasticity. This, in turn, supports the interpretation that speciation in this group is largely concordant with a non-adaptive hypothesis, which results mainly from vicariant processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.