ArticleEye (London, England)2025
Risk of glaucoma with bisphosphonate use in patients with osteoporosis: a case-control study.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bisphosphonate-related ocular adverse events: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.Endocrine connections · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeBisphosphonates (BPs) are first line agents commonly used in the management of osteoporosis. There have been two case reports that have suggested a possible link between BPs and acute angle closure (AAC). In the absence of any large epidemiologic studies, we sought to determine the risk of AAC and OAG with bisphosphonate use in patients with osteoporosis.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study with a case control analysis from 2008-2018. The study used the PharMetrics Plus Database (IQVIA, USA) which captures health claims for over 150 million unique patients, with fully adjudicated pharmacy and medical claims, and represents all geographic areas of the United States. 208,111 patients with osteoporosis were included in the study. AAC and OAG cases were defined by an ICD-9/10 code and had to have at least one prescription for bisphosphonate every 3 months in the year prior to the index date. The date of the first event of AAC was designated as the index date.
resultsBisphosphonate users were more likely to develop AAC than non-users (adjusted IRR = 1.78, 95%CI [1.05-3.01]). In particular, those on risedronate were more likely to develop AAC compared to patients who used other formulations of bisphosphonates (adjusted IRRs = 2.12, 95%CI [1.05-3.01]). There was no risk for OAG with bisphosphonate use.
conclusionsPatients with osteoporosis who used BPs were at a higher risk for AAC compared to those who did not, and those who were on risedronate were more likely to develop AAC compared to patients who used other types of bisphosphonates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.