ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2025
Automated MRI pituitary structured reporting from free-text using a fine-tuned Llama model: a feasibility study.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness, Safety, and Workflow Burden of Large Language Model-Based Medical Report Generation: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveStructured reports in radiology have demonstrated substantial advantages over unstructured ones. However, the transition from unstructured to structured reporting can face challenges, as experienced radiologists worry about the potential loss of valuable information. In this study, we fine-tuned the Llama 2 model capable of generating structured pituitary MRI reports from unstructured reports.
methodsWe used a training set comprising 104 pituitary MRI reports to fine-tune Llama 2 and 26 reports as a test set to evaluate the system. The dataset was annotated manually by three expert radiologists. For this annotation, the radiologists used the unstructured report and structured it into eight anatomical landmarks: adenohypophysis, pituitary stalk, optic chiasm, suprasellar cistern, neurohypophysis, cavernous sinuses, sphenoid sinuses and other findings.
resultsLlama2 achieves a value greater than 0.79 on the ROUGE-L metric in four anatomical landmarks from free-text pituitary MRI reports. The other anatomical landmarks exceed 0.61 of ROUGE-L except for the other findings section.
conclusionsOur study suggests good performance in structuring anatomical landmarks on pituitary MRI reports using the fine-tune Llama 2 model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39730936What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.