Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39730936›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2025

Automated MRI pituitary structured reporting from free-text using a fine-tuned Llama model: a feasibility study.

Pilar López-Úbeda, Teodoro Martín-Noguerol, Jorge Escartín, Alberto Cabrera-Zubizarreta, Antonio Luna

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pilar López-ÚbedaNLP Department. HT Medica, Carmelo Torres nº2, 23007, Jaén, Spain. p.lopez@htmedica.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0478-743X
Teodoro Martín-NoguerolMRI Unit, Radiology Department, HT Medica. Carmelo Torres nº2, 23007, Jaén, Spain.
Jorge EscartínNeurorradiología Diagnostica E Intervencionista, HT Médica Córdoba-Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Alberto Cabrera-ZubizarretaMRI Unit, Radiology Department, HT Médica. Hospital Covadonga. Gral. Suárez Valdés, 40, 33204, Gijón, Spain.
Antonio LunaMRI Unit, Radiology Department, HT Medica. Carmelo Torres nº2, 23007, Jaén, Spain.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PTQ2021-012120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveStructured reports in radiology have demonstrated substantial advantages over unstructured ones. However, the transition from unstructured to structured reporting can face challenges, as experienced radiologists worry about the potential loss of valuable information. In this study, we fine-tuned the Llama 2 model capable of generating structured pituitary MRI reports from unstructured reports.

methodsWe used a training set comprising 104 pituitary MRI reports to fine-tune Llama 2 and 26 reports as a test set to evaluate the system. The dataset was annotated manually by three expert radiologists. For this annotation, the radiologists used the unstructured report and structured it into eight anatomical landmarks: adenohypophysis, pituitary stalk, optic chiasm, suprasellar cistern, neurohypophysis, cavernous sinuses, sphenoid sinuses and other findings.

resultsLlama2 achieves a value greater than 0.79 on the ROUGE-L metric in four anatomical landmarks from free-text pituitary MRI reports. The other anatomical landmarks exceed 0.61 of ROUGE-L except for the other findings section.

conclusionsOur study suggests good performance in structuring anatomical landmarks on pituitary MRI reports using the fine-tune Llama 2 model.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPituitary GlandRadiology Information SystemsFeasibility StudiesHumansMRI pituitaryNatural language processingStructured reporting

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.